Laserfiche WebLink
_.: ~-- <br />Tom Gillis - 2 - May 4, 1990 <br />Test Plot Mean Parameter Values by Soil Depth <br />Soil Depth Tot Cov Cht Cov Tot Prod Cht Prod Shrub Density <br />6" 36.2'b 8.7a 306#/AC 25.3#/AC 905/AC <br />12" 47.5'b 13.2$ 481#/AC 51.3#/AC 616/AC <br />24" 52.6 13.28 595#/AC 113.7#/AC 377/AC <br />48" 37.6$ 5.2~ 606#/AC 23.D#/AC 174/AC <br />Based on average Dlot values, it would appear that cover and production <br />success standards are being met with the 6" soil cover depth, althouoh both <br />cover and Droduction consistently increased as soil depth increased up to 24 <br />inches. Shrub density shows an inverse relationship with soil depth althoua_h <br />shrub height increases with soil depth. Establishment of seeded perennial <br />forts was very poor across all test D1ots and the remainder of the 5.2 acre <br />Roadside Refuse Pile, which received 6" of cover soil and was seeded <br />concurrently with the test plots. The noxious weed whitetop (Cardaria drabs) <br />has become established within two of the test plots and other portions one <br />refuse area and will need to be controlled to prevent further spread. <br />Concerns expressed previously by the Division based on the 1986 evaluation <br />included the need for verification of cover soil depths, dominance of <br />cheatarass and absence of desirable forts, and the need for concurrent <br />reference area data collection. The 1989 report includes soil depth <br />documentation and reference area data. cheatarass abundance was much reduced <br />on all plots in 1988 and was not apparent during my inspection in April of <br />this year. Perennial fort abundance does not appear to have increased since <br />1986, with the exception of the undesirable noxious weed, whitetop. <br />Soi1JlJaste-Analyses <br />Soils in the general area are typically shallow sandy foams with sodic or <br />saline/sodic subsoils. These conditions, combined with the relative aridity <br />of the region account for the nature of the native vegetative communities <br />which are dominated by low crowing salt tolerant shrubs. Based on the <br />available analyses of the coal waste, its primary limitations as a a_rowth <br />medium are probably its coarse texture (low water holding capacity) and black <br />color. pH and SAR levels, while high, are within the range encountered in the <br />native subsoils. Soil samples taken at incremental depths within the test <br />plots indicate that no upward migration of sodium or other salts has occurred. <br />Recommendations <br />For the Cameo Refuse Disposal areas, I would preliminarily recommend a <br />minimum soil replacement depth of 12", assuming that additional coal <br />waste analyses confirm that the material in the Cameo piles is <br />comparable to that in the Roadside pile. At least 2 analyses <br />representative of portions of CRDA #1 and #2 which have been in place <br />for more than one year will need to be submitted with the TR <br />application. A recommended parai,titer list is attached. <br />