My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP02859
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP02859
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:33:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/16/1998
Doc Name
KERR COAL CO MARR MINE VEGETATION SAMPLING FOR INTERIM MONITORING AND BOND RELEASE TABLE CONTENTS
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' monitoring program for ocular estimation of cover by this technique. For this project, the time <br />efficiencies of Quadrat sampling are minimized over the line transect method in the reclaimed <br />area since a line transect must be established anyway for shrub density sampling. As a result. <br />the line transect method, utilizing a 50 meter line transect, was employed. Points were recorded <br />at every meter along the 50 meter tape. <br />A ten-point frame positioned perpendicular to the transect and on the right side of [he tape <br />was utilized to minimize potential bias The sixth pin from the tape was used to record the <br />sample point <br />' Production: <br /> Rocky Mountain Reclamation utilized a meter square quadrat for production sampling. A <br /> smaller quadrat could be substituted, but sample adequacy would be expected to be reduced if <br />' the same number of quadrats were sampled. Utilizing a meter square quadrat for this study was <br /> an important factor leading to the high degree of statistical reliability obtained from this year's <br /> sampling. <br /> The meter square quadrat was randomly located utilizing two random numbers and was <br /> located the distance of the first number along the transect and the distance of the second <br />cti <br />di <br />l <br />th <br />di <br />f th <br />b <br />i <br />di <br />t <br />ti <br />t <br /> on perpen <br />rec <br />num <br />er <br />n a <br />re <br />cu <br />ar <br />o <br />e <br />on o <br />e <br />ape. <br /> Samples were collected by life form by clipping this year's above ground biomass <br /> production. Bagged samples were then oven dried at 1000 until weights were stabilized. <br /> Weights were then recorded to the nearest 0.1 gram. <br /> Shrub Density: <br /> Shrub density for the reclaimed area was determined utilizing 100 square meter Belt <br />' Transects. Shrub density data collection were not required for the reference area as this <br /> information is already available. Shrubs were individually counted for 1.0 meter on each side of <br /> the 50 meter line transect used for cover estimation. <br /> Statistical Analyses: <br /> Data were collected, analyzed, and presented according to the procedures and formats <br /> discussed with Ms. Janet Binns, State of Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. Sampling <br />' continued until required sample adequacy was met. A one-sided test with a 0.10 alpha error <br /> probability consistent with a 90 percent confidence level was utilized for statistical analyses. <br /> Sampling analyses included the actual confidence level attained from field sampling (Appendix <br />' B, Cover, Production, and Shrub Density tables), <br />For the two reference areas, fifty sample locations (for the line transects and quadrats) <br />' were initially randomly located prior to field work and were then established in the field. A grid <br />was established for each reference area and a random numbers table was utilized to locate <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.