My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP02800
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP02800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:33:41 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:20:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/27/2006
Doc Name
2005 Annual Hydrology Report
From
BTU Empire Corporation
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2) In the area of the 3rd South Mains, the railroad is at an elevation of approximately 6,140' amsl and <br />the F-Seam is at about 5,750' amsl, so the intervening overburden is roughly 400' thick. The <br />massive Middle Sandstone is approximately 100' thick in this area and lies approximately 80' <br />above the F-Seam. <br />Given that mining of the F-Seam under the proposed liability release area occurred during the early <br />1970's through mid 1980's, much of this mining was pre-law. The existing approved permit addresses <br />those activities that occurred subsequent to passage of SMCRA and the interim regulatory period, as well <br />as anticipated future mining activities. Section 2.05.6(6) of the PAP provides specific discussions and <br />plans for subsidence monitoring, surveys, a subsidence control plan. These discussions specifically <br />include information on subsidence control and monitoring for the rail-line with respect to planned and <br />future mining activities. <br />Historic underground mine workings in the general vicinity of the cell tower and communications structure <br />are probably pre-law. In addition, these structures do not overlie historic mine workings, and the potential <br />for subsidence effects is negligible given that the nearby mining was limited to advance room and pillar <br />mining with retention of the supporting pillars on retreat, and overburden thicknesses in this area exceed <br />700', including four massive sandstone units (the Middle Sandstone, Twentymile Sandstone, and two <br />others, totaling over 300' in combined thickness). <br />Access roads in the mine area are not a concern relative to subsidence control, monitoring, and mitigation, <br />for the same reasons outlined above, because most of the roads are oevned and used by BTU Empire, and <br />because the access roads are light-use roads that can be readily repaired if affected by subsidence to <br />maintain effective access (no repair work has been necessary in the approximately 10-years since active <br />mining operations ceased or in the approximately 20- to 30-years following completion of mining in this <br />area). <br />20. Dewatering of underground mine workings, the treatment acrd discharging of water generated from <br />mine dewatering, and the operation and maintenance of equipment and facilities associated with mine <br />dewatering are activities over which the Division exercises regulatory authority. The Division cmtnot <br />approve final liabt~lity release or Phase 117 bond release for activities within its jurisdiction that <br />continue to occur at the time a fi~ral liability release or Phase III bond release request is submitted. <br />Ongoing dewatering may present water quality and subsidence impact effects that differ from the water <br />quality and subsidence impacts expected once dewatering ceases. As such, the Division may not be <br />able to approve this final liability release or Phase III bond release request in areas where mine <br />dewatering activities are actively occurring. Please discuss therefore, wDzether the mine workings that <br />lie beneatlr The areas subject to this bond release request are currently being dewaterec~ and whether <br />the water being generated from t/zis dewatering is being treated and disc{urrged Please also address <br />the issue of long term water quality and sr~bsidence impacts when pumping ceases, relative to current <br />conditions. <br />Response: Please refer to the previous responses to Comments 12, 13, and 16. The area addressed by the <br />proposed liability release is well above the active dewatering horizon and is, therefore, not directly <br />affected by ongoing dewatering activities. Long-term hydrologic and subsidence impacts are addressed in <br />the PAP by the discussions of Probable Hydrologic Consequences (Section 2.05.6(5)) and Subsidence <br />Monitoring, Subsidence Survey, and Subsidence Control Plan (Section 2.05.6(6)). <br />•As noted in the previous response to Comment 19, subsidence discussions do not directly address this <br />area, given it's pre-law status, however, the general discussion of mining-related subsidence effects is <br />applicable. It is important to note that in the approximately 20-30 years since mining was completed in <br />Liability Release Response - No. 3 3 12/07/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.