Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiniiiiii <br />999 <br />• STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources <br />1 31 7 Sherman 51., Roum 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FAX~(303)832-8106 <br />interoffice <br />MEMORANDUM <br />to: File C-84-063 Eastside Mine <br />from: tfyriftCi. Watker <br />subject: Finding ofCompliance, 1998 Annual Hydrology Report <br />date: January 10, 1999 <br />II~~~~ <br />DEPAR7'MEIJT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Goeernor <br />lames S Lochhead <br />Execw me Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Divrsion Director <br />Rule 4.05.13(4)(c): A hydrologic report shall be submitted to the Division annually with the date <br />of snbnrittal determined in consultntion yvith the pernrittee. The anmral hydrologic report shall <br />contain at a minimtmr: <br />The report was received in the Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) on Febntary 10, 1999 <br />under a Stephen Self letter of January 28, 1999. No submittal date is stated in the permit ("An <br />annual hydrology report will be submitted to the Division afrer completion of the calendar year." <br />This might be a mid-term review item.). <br />Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(i): Water gnanti[y du[n obtnined from ench monita•ing site daring the wuter <br />yenr; <br />The report is incompliance with this nde with the approved exception that water quantity data was <br />submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year (Permit, page 59). <br />Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(ii): Water quality data obtained ¢~om each moni[oring site during the water year; <br />artd <br />The report is in compliance with this nde with the approved exception that water quality data was <br />submitted by calendar yeaz in-lieu-of water year (Permit, page 59). <br />Rule 4.05.14(4)(e)(iii): /f required by the Division, u written interpretation of the data and <br />identification ojmining related impacts [o the hydrologic balance. <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. There is no requirement in the Permit for a written <br />interpretation ofthe data, but a summary of impacts is provided in the report. The table ofcontents <br />of the report miss-cites the 1998 water monitoring as 1999. The Permit requires semi-annual (high <br />