My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP02046
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP02046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:09:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/21/1994
Doc Name
1992 AHR Review Letter
From
Cyprus Yampa Coal Corporation
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1992
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i~ ~. <br />C c~~eus <br />"~ Yampavauey <br /> <br />January 18, 1994 <br />Kent Gorham <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Coat Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road #27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303-879-3800 <br />REC~IV~D <br />JAN 21 199¢ <br />Cfl'f.IQO CP T9(08f21S G ~~,C.!QO), <br />1313 Sherman Street, R_oom_ 215__ _ , _ ." _ -----.t ~---_---- -- _ --- ~_ -_ . - - <br />Denver,~ CO 80203- "' <br />Dear Mr. Gorham; <br />Enclosed, please, find materials which should complete the <br />information packet previously submitted with the initial responses <br />to the referenced AHR review. These items address points noted in <br />your letter dated 10 December, and hopefully will serve to complete <br />/ clarify those items.. Each Division concern is re-stated, and is <br />followed .immediately by TCC's response. <br />t. <br />DMG Concern <br />1. Site 1003 elevation is still incorrect on either the data sheet <br />or the station/elevation table at the beginning of the data <br />section. Please correct as necessary. <br />TCC Response <br />Upon review, it"would"appear that the elevation"values for both of <br />the referenced pages are the same, and are in fact correct. <br />However, further review revealed that the update of Table 1 did not <br />include the correction of the 1003 elevation value. A copy of the <br />pertinent Table 1 revised page is enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />2. Site 8 depth <br />-1.62. depth <br />-1.02 depth <br />-3.75 depth <br />and flow readings <br />6.7 cfs <br />0.6 cfs <br />0.6 cfs <br />reveal the following: <br />Different depths are shown as being converted to the same <br />discharge. Please correct this information and Table 30. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.