My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01889
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:37 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:06:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/27/1998
Doc Name
1997 Reclamation Studies & Shrub Establishment Monitoring at Seneca II & IIW Mines
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• SECTION A: SHRUB ESTABLISHMENT MONITORING <br />Introduction <br />Annual shrub density monitoring was conducted in woody plant establishment plots at the <br />Seneca II and Seneca II-W Mines during September 2-4, 1997 and September 24-25, 1997. <br />Monitoring was conducted on seventeen shrub planting units ranging from one to three years in <br />age. Plots were monitored for shrub density, grass/forb canopy cover and general species <br />composition. The purpose of monitoring these sites is to evaluate the relative success of various <br />reclamation methods and to identify planting units which may require augmented planting in <br />order to qualify for bond release. <br />Methods for Shrub Establishment Monitoring <br />Shrub Density. Approximately 1.8-15% of each woody plant establishment unit was sampled <br />through the use of systematically placed permanent belt transects as illustrated in Figure 1 (Table <br />1). In newly planted azeas, a baseline was subjectively placed pazallel to the unit contour and <br />permanently mazked by steel posts at the endpoints. When possible, existing boundazy mazkers <br />were used as endpoints for the baseline. Permanent belt transects (2 meters x 25 meters) were <br />systematically placed perpendiculaz to the baseline within each'plot with endpoints mazked by <br />wooden stakes. In certain instances, more than one baseline was used in order to attain a <br />sufficient sample size or to insure adequate coverage of vazied topography. All shrubs present <br />• within each transect were identified and counted. Analysis consisted of calculating the average <br />stem density from existing and original numbers of individuals within each transect. <br />All planting units were sampled in a similaz manner with the exceptions of 95-4 and 95-1. <br />Planting Unit 95-4 is part of the Topsoil Depth /Shrub Establishment Study and was sampled <br />randomly as opposed to systematically in order to meet statistical criteria. Planting Unit 95-1 is <br />part of the recently completed Herbivory Study and was sampled within randomized blocks <br />instead of belt transects. <br />Percent Coverage by Life-form. Plant canopy cover was measured by systematically placing <br />0.5 meter X 0.5 meter quadrats to the right of the 5, 15, and 25 meter mazks of each transect. <br />Within each quadrat, a cover class was assigned to each life-form utilizing a modified <br />Daubenmire cover scale (FSH 12/87 R-1 Supp I). Results are reported as percent coverage by <br />life-form. <br />Species Composition. Species composition was determined within each shrub planting azea <br />through the use of an oculaz survey. The site was traversed and all species encountered recorded. <br />Potential noxious weed problems were noted. <br />r1 <br />~J <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.