My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01743
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:22 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:03:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/10/1992
Doc Name
1990 RESPONSE TO REVIEW OF 1990 WATER YEAR ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT PERMIT
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY
To
MLRD
Annual Report Year
1990
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 8, 1992 <br />Page 5 <br />MLRD Concern <br />Ponds <br />1) All requirements were met. <br />TCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Springs <br />All requirements were met. <br />TCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Water Quality Analysis <br />Bedrock Wells <br />The statement is made "the data for well 006-83-48C does indicate that the water <br />quality has been affected by migration of fluids from the cemented zone of the well <br />into the open area of the well". Please provide the evidence that led you to this <br />conclusion. The predicted hydrologic impact on the Trout Creek sandstone aquifer is <br />"no impact"; however, it does not appear the existing Trout Creek wells are <br />appropriately monitored to determine impact, if any. If the well is indeed <br />contaminated, a new well needs to be installed. please submit a minor revision to <br />install a new Trout Creek well and to change the monitoring requirements for that well <br />to semi-annual level and field parameters as well as semi-annual full-suite quality <br />measurements (the same requirements as well 001-83-106). <br />TCC Response <br />As previously discussed, TCC verbally requested that the decision on whether to <br />replace the referenced well be delayed until the data could be reviewed by the <br />consultant writing up the 1991 AHR to determine if an outside party concurred with <br />our conclusions. As such, TCC has not submitted the requested minor revision at this <br />time pending further discussion of the options and the determinations of the <br />consultant. The referenced assessment concerning possible contamination of the well <br />is based upon the elevated pH readings obtained. This has been attributed to the <br />possible degradation of the grout from the cemented portion, which appears to have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.