My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01616
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:01 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/20/1990
Doc Name
CYPRUS ORCHARD VALLEY MINE FN C-81-038 1990 MINE INFLOW REPORT
From
CYPRUS ORCHARD VALLEY
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
MINE INFLOW REPORTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />DATE: September 14, 1989 <br />T0: Jeff Clayton <br />FROM: Cathy Begej (~ <br />RE: Orchard Valley 1989 Mine Inflow Study, C-81-038 <br />I have reviewed the Orchard Valley Annual Mine Inflows study. They have met <br />the minimum requirements of Stipulation 4, but no more. It is a very <br />qualitative report. I would like to see the following improvements in future <br />reports. <br />1. Flow from the Steven's Gulch water line should be measured to <br />document mine usage. It would be nice to know the quality of that <br />water in trying to assess the source of the very alkaline, saline <br />water. <br />2. An estimate of the volume of standing water in the mine coupled <br />with an estimate of the surface area of exposed water and the <br />evaporation rate. Their estimates of water consumption in the mine <br />are very vague and extrapolated from 1985-1986 data. <br />3. I think that the change in water quality justifies a request to <br />monitor field parameters on all areas of standing water to assess <br />the degree of heterogeneity within the mine. <br />I have the following specific questions about th 1989 Report: <br />1. Please clarify the meaning of the areas marked with diagonal lines <br />and diagonal dots and hyphens. A legend apparently did not get <br />finished on the central right side of the map. <br />2. The ]988 report noted a 0.25 gpm drip between Panels G and H (1988 <br />Site 25). Did the seep really disappear this year? <br />A brief summary of the report follows. Mine inflows have decreased from 3 gpm <br />in 1988 to 2.5 gpm in 1989. This is higher than the 1 gpm recorded in 1987, <br />but is to be expected given the expansion of the extent of the workings. The <br />permit application projected worst case inflows of 5.2 gpm below East Rootcap <br />Creek and 5.7 gpm below Stevens Gulch with 33.5 gpm throughout the <br />life-of-mine. It collects along north and east faces of mains. The main <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.