My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01579
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:57 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/27/2006
Doc Name
2005 Annual Hydrology & Annual Reclamation Report
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Savage and Savage <br />Memorandum <br />To: Donald W. MacDonald, Coors Energy Company <br />From: Michael Savage, Savage and Savage, Inc. <br />Date: June 24, 2005 <br />Subject: Second Quarter 2005 Pest and Disease Inspection; Keenesburg Mine <br />File #: C-81-028 <br />On June 23, 2005 I conducted an inspection of the reclaimed and revegetated azeas at the <br />Keenesburg Mine for evidence of plant pests or diseases that could affect the re- <br />established vegetation at the Keenesburg Mine. <br />The mine site has received relatively normal amounts of precipitation this year, much <br />occurring during the last days of May and eazly June. As a result of the spring moisture, <br />cheatgrass has appeared in many areas. To remove thatch buildup and control the <br />cheatgrass from setting seed in the revegetated areas, several azeas were burned. The <br />areas that were control burned included Area 2, the west side of Area 11, portions of <br />. Areas 17 and 18, portions of Areas 21 and 22, and the northeast side of topsand pile A-3. <br />Revegetated azeas were inspected by pedestrian and vehiculaz means including azeas 1- <br />11, 14-19, 21, 23, and 24-28. The sediment pond, dugout, small cottonwood grove, <br />overburden and topsand stockpiles, and the active reclamation B Pit area were also <br />inspected for any potential weedy invasive species. <br />I did not identify any disease conditions at any of the reclaimed and revegetated azeas or <br />within the mine site. Nor did I identify any plant pests which had affected the growth of <br />the vegetation during the past growing season. No areas which experienced any <br />infestation or blight were found during the inspection. <br />C: Keenesburg Pest and Disease Inspection File <br />Danny Kipp, Keenesburg Mine <br /> <br />Page 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.