Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />Mathews, Dan <br />From: Burnell, Jim <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:51 PM <br />To: Mathews, Dan <br />Cc: Brown, Sandy; Berry, David <br />Subject: Powderhorn analyses <br />Dan, <br />In response to your questions regarding the analyses, not much difference. Obviously. Must have been more particulate <br />matter in last year's analysis. <br />SAR is pretty high. An SAR in soil that high requires amendments, but this gets diluted tremendously. <br />Yes, we should go with "dissolved" constituents. <br />We will take up that issue in the Hydro Task Force, but haven't had a meeting yet. <br />jim <br />