My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01467
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01467
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:52 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:58:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1984 AHR
Annual Report Year
1984
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
QUARTERLY REPORT <br />OCTOBER 1984 THROUGH DECEMBER 1984 <br />WEST ELK COAL COMPANY <br />SCOPE: <br />J The following is a summary of baseline hydrologic data collected <br />during the period of October through December, 1984. <br />The work accomplished during this period consisted of the <br />1 maintenance and upkeep of eight (8) continuous streamflow gaging <br />stations, static water level measurements on eighteen (18) ground <br />water wells, and precipitation data collected from the manual <br />precipitation gage near the Horse Creek flume. The data obtained <br />l during the quarter and for the calender year are summarized in <br />i Tables 1 through 27. <br />HYDROLOGY: <br />The hydrology monitoring program was modified at the beginning of <br />the mid-year quarter to conform with modifications specified in a <br />CMLRD memo from Roy Cox to Bob Liddle dated August 12, 1983, and <br />with conclusions reached and stated in Watec's monitoring report <br />dated February 13, 1984. <br />Surface 'dater Monitoring - Streams <br />The eight continuous flow monitoring stations were visited at <br />least monthly during the calender year 1984. Flow records and <br />staff gage readings were collected from the recorders, and on the <br />spot remedial work was performed~as might be required to continue <br />' obtaining accurate records. The were records unavoidably lost to <br />equipment failure, high runoff damage (see especially Lick and <br />Minnesota creek records), and beaver activity. <br />' Prior to the end of the calender year the Minnesota Creek flume <br />had been cleared of debris, and its backfill replaced with larger <br />stone in preparation for Spring runoff. The Lick Creek flume had <br />' been reset in the channel and completely backfilled. The beaver <br />problem at Upper Dry Fork Minnesota Creek remains. <br />Flow measurements are presented in Tables 1 through 8. <br />-83- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.