My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01387
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:47 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:56:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/1996
Doc Name
Mine Inflow Study 1995
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX C <br />MINE INFLOW STUDY <br />C-1 NEW ELK MINE <br />During the third quarter of 1989, the New Elk Mine was sealed and access to the mine workings <br />terminated. Mine inflows are flooding the abandoned mine workings. Previous studies and <br />reports suggested an inflow of 177 gallons per minute (gpm) and calculated inflows ranged from <br />142 to 468 gpm based on measurements taken at Station NEW-4. A number of approximations <br />were made in the calculation of rates of inflow. From mine maps, the dip of the mine floor was <br />determined to be 5%, and the water line crosses approximately 12,000 linear feet of mined <br />areas. The available volume is based on an average extraction of 60 %. The calculations assume <br />that the entire mined azea below the water level measured in NEW-4 is flooded (i.e., no trapped <br />air pockets). Graph C-1.1 Grormdwater Recovery, New Elk Mine, portrays the rise of <br />groundwater in (flooding of) the sealed New Elk Mine. As expected, a trend of lowering inflow <br />rates might be developing. The trend could represent a lower quantity of inflows due to some <br />recharge taking place or reduction of inflows due to hydrostatic pressures at depth. Continued <br />monitoring will provide the information to clarify the phenomena, and permit a more accurate <br />projection of hydrologic consequences. <br />C-2 GOLDEN EAGLE MINE <br />• The 1995 Golden Eagle Mine Inflow Study was performed August 31, 1995. Flows, <br />conductivity, and pH were acquired form seventeen locations in the mine. Most of the flow was <br />derived from entries 3, 4, and 5, 3rd North (#56) and SE-1 TG (#15) (Table C-2.1) Mine <br />inflow is estimated indirectly in this analysis in the following Table C-2.2. Point source inflows <br />are from faults, fractured roof, fractured floor, exploration drill hole, etc. Area wide inflows <br />were observed as drainage from seals to abandoned mine workings; areas of weeping coal faces, <br />roof, or floors; and unsealed mine azeas; etc. Locations of mine inflows are shown on Exhibit <br />2. <br /> <br />HYDRP795.292\12\03-29-96(7:06am) C-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.