My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01377
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01377
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:56:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/18/1994
Doc Name
DIVISON REVIEW OF EDNA RESPONSES TO CDMG LETTER DATED JULY 19 1994
From
DMG
To
SUSAN MORRISON
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii i i iii ii iiiiii iiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1717 Sherman Sl., Room 215 `d <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 ~ <br />~~ <br /> <br />Phone: 17031 866-3567 II <br />FA%:1703) 832-8106 <br /> DePAarn~rrr of <br /> NATURAI <br />Date: October ls, 1994 RESOURCE` <br />To: Susan Morrison <br />. Rnv Romer <br />Governor <br />/~'~~ <br />r/ uJ.\ lames i Lochhead <br />l~%) <br />~r ~{ <br />From: Kent Gorha ll Executive Director <br />/ Michael B. Long <br />/ <br />CC: David Berry Division Director <br />RE: Division review of Edna responses to CDMG letter dated July <br />19, 1994 <br />I have reviewed the information you provided to me via the P & M <br />Coal Co. concerning the reasons why establishing a Trout Creek <br />Sandstone monitoring well at the Edna mine is not necessary. My <br />original adequacy issue was stated as follows: <br />1. The operator should establish a Trout Creek sandstone <br />bedrock well so that the Division can verify the presence (or <br />lack of) an impact to the Trout Creek sandstone. Discussions <br />on why .this is necessary have taken place previously and no <br />permitting action should be approved without this requirement <br />being met. <br />Only the second paragraph of the one page provided dealt with the <br />Trout Creek sandstone bedrock unit. Furthermore, no data, graphs, <br />maps, or charts were provided. The mine is actively mining in a <br />portion of the recharge zone of the Trout Creek sandstone. Also, no <br />further discussion of faulting, particularly in the Moffat area, <br />was provided. It was my understanding that faults are present. <br />From the text that was provided, the only conclusion that can be <br />made is that water from a unit 24 feet below the coal seam could <br />possibly enter the pit as inflow. How this relates to the Trout <br />Creek Sandstone unit I am not sure. <br />One of the findings that the Division is required to make at final <br />bond release is that pollution of surface and sub-surface waters is <br />not occurring. Also we are required to ensure that the approximate <br />recharge capacity has been restored after mining. Adown-gradient <br />well in the Trout Creek Sandstone will allow the Division to make <br />these finding for this regional aquifer. <br />In summary, the operator should immediately establish this well and <br />include it in its hydrologic monitoring program. <br />If .you have questions, let me know. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.