My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01123
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:04 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:53:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/15/1992
Doc Name
SEMI ANNUAL SUBSIDENCE MONITORING REPORT PERIOD 05-01 10-31-92 YOUR FN C-81-014
From
ENERGY FUELS COAL INC
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Southfield Mine <br />Semi-Annual Subsidence Monitorine Renort <br />(May I , 1992 -October 31, 1992) <br />Introduction <br />This report presents summarized field survey data and discussion of subsidence predictions in <br />accordance with the requirements of Colorado Coal Mining and Reclamation Permit No. C-81-014. <br />The following discussion of tureen[ subsidence data includes comparing measured subsidence to <br />predicted values, documented by three summary data tables of survey data for the montunents and structures <br />with accompanying cross section diagrams of the high resolution monument grid. <br />Discussion <br />I) Monitored structures include the following: <br />Thompson Ranch (3 buildings) <br />Florence Water Line (8 monuments) <br />Newlin Creek (I monument) <br />Survey monitoring data for the above structures for the reporting period are summarized on Table 2, <br />Florence Water Line and Table 3, Thompson Ranch Structures and Newlin Creek Point. <br />The survey data obtained from the two quarterly monitoring field surveys indicate that nu <br />measurable subsidence has occured at any of the above structures during the period of this report. This <br />condition corcelates to the fact that no recent retreat mining has been done below the monitored structures. <br />1\4easured subsidence at monument 'E' along the Florence Water Line remains at 1.50 feet, well within the <br />maximum predicted value of 2.79 documented in the permit application. <br />2) The high resolution monitoring grid includes the following: <br />South Subsidence Grid (23 monuments) <br />Survey monitoring data for the above monuments are summarized on Tnl~le I, South Stthsiclence <br />Grid and are presented in cross section format on Figures 1 and 2. <br />A review of the survey data obtained from the one semi-annual field survey indicates that no <br />additional subsidence has occured in the area of the monitoring grid. These data continue ut verify that <br />ground strata have almost completely consolidated since the period of retreat mining. In addition, the <br />maximum measured subsidence of 2.31 feet (monument 15) is only 43 percent of the maximum predicted <br />subsidence value of 5.40 feet. <br />The estimated angle of draw is depicted on Figure I indicating an angle of approxim:uely 25 <br />degrees. This draw angle is comparable to the 20 to 25 degree angle of draw predicted in the approved <br />permit application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.