My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP00993
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP00993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:30:40 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
3.2 GROUND WATER
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />flume. The hydrograph exhibits a dual peak with initial runoff from the lower drainage in <br />the first peak and a secondary peak as runoff travels from the upper reaches of the <br />drainage. Following a review of the data collected to date, ~~~ILR approval to <br />decommission the station was obtained in August and monitoring ceased on August 27, <br />1985. <br />Station ACF-1 is located in Apache Canyon approximately one-half mile from the <br />Purgatoire River. drainage area of the canyon is 7566 acres with cover comprised mostly <br />of woodland. Grazing and wildlife are the major land uses. D.4ining is also a land use with <br />two shafts and a power substation located in the canyon. The spring and seep survey <br />conducted in 1984 and 1985 (Appendix 4) monitored two seeps and one USGS spring, none <br />of which were major contributions to stream flow. The flume station was monitored <br />quaterly for water quality, however, no flow was encountered (Table 1-9 of Appendix 1). <br />Flaw was measured by the flume (Table 1-11 of Appendix l). Of the 239 days the station <br />was monitored, mean 24-hour discharge was 0.001 cfs or 0.72 ac-ft annually. The 1985 <br />hydrograph for the station is presented in Figure 5 as 24-hour mean flow. Flow ranged <br />from 0.001 to 9.7 cfs (Table .1-11 of Appendix 1). Figure 7 presents the typical storm <br />water runoff hydrograph at the flume which exhibits a spike of flow for only those intense <br />showers producing significant runoff. This single spike of short duration may be a <br />function of land uses in the canyon. Since grazing is the major land use, vegetation in the <br />valley bottom is sparse which increases the runoff potential. Also, there are two on- <br />stream impoundments in the upper drainage which impound surface flow. The mine inflow <br />study conducted during 1985 (Appendix 3) identified the two shafts as contributing <br />approximately 10 gpm of inflow which may be coming from the alluvial system. All of <br />these factors contribute to the low runoff observed at the flume station. Following a <br />review of the data collected to date, DALR approval to decommission the station was <br />obtained in August and monitoring ceased on August 27, 1985. <br />3.2 Ground Water <br />Six wells in the Purgatoire River alluvium and one <br />Ciruela Canyons were monitored monthly during 1985. <br />Purgatoire alluvium responded directly to the level of water <br />canyons responded primarily to precipitation received in <br />contained in Tables 2-1 through 2-8 of Appendix 1. <br />-19- <br />well in each of Apache and <br />Generally, wells within the <br />in the river. \Vells in the two <br />the drainage. All data is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.