My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP00929
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP00929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:29:56 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:48:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/7/1988
Doc Name
LAKE EMMA FIELD PLOT TRIALS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o~~ o~~ • <br />~~~~,~ <br />Treatments and Seed Mixture <br />Each treatment, including the control, was applied <br />growth medium. All plots were seeded with the <br />descriptions of each treatment and of the seed mixture. <br />• <br />to one of the four plot: on each <br />same seed mixture. Below aze <br />TREATMENT 1--CONTROL. The control plots received no amendments. Each control <br />plot was tilled, raked and seeded only. <br />TREATMENT 2-ORGANIC AMENDMENT. To each plot receiving this treatm~;nt, a 1:1 <br />mixture of steer manure and sphagntun peat moss was applied at a rate of 10 ton/acre <br />(field weight basis). The purpose of this treatment is to enhance the physical <br />characteristics of the growth media, and to provide nutrients for plants and an organic <br />matter substrate for soil micro-organisms. <br />TREATMENT 3--CONTROL OF PH. Treatment 3 consists of a combination of lime and <br />a proprietary acidifying bacteria inhibitor manufactured by ProMac Systems, a <br />subsidiary of B. F. Goodrich. This treatment was formulated by ProMac based on <br />their sampling and analyses of lake sediment and waste rock materials from the site. <br />Lake sediment plots (I and II) were limed with 1.5 ton/acre calcium ct~rbonate <br />equivalent; waste rock plots (III) received ProMac only and no lime. ProMac pellets <br />and powder were applied to each plot in accordance with ProMac's specifications. <br />Materials were broadcast evenly over each plot area at the following rates- <br />ProMac 2000SB - 198 parts <br />` ProMac 2000PN - 84 parts <br />ProMac 2000PB - 119 parts <br />ProMac 2000PY - 99 parts <br />~ Each of these ProMac materials is formulated to provide different controlled rates of <br />release of bactericidal active ingredient The active ingredient is selective for free living <br />acid-forming autotrophic bacteria (e.g.,Thiobacillus and Ferrobacillus), but does not <br />affect beneficial heterotrophic bacteria or other types of micro-organisms in the soil. <br />Results with ProMac technology on acid coal spoil in the eastern United States have <br />shown great promise for effective long term control of acidification. The product has <br />only been on the market for a year and has been little tested in the west. <br />TREATMENT 4-FERTILIZER. Aslow-release nitrogen fertilizer developed for the <br />' turfgrass industry was used on all fertilized plots. The material is a proprietary form of <br />granulaz urea formaldehyde sold as Blue Chip Nitroform by Nor-Am Chemi~;a1 Co. <br />This product is 38 percent total nitrogen (elemental basis). The material was broadcast <br />evenly by hand over each plot to be fertilized in accordance with the study design. <br />Application rate was SO lb/acre elemental N. The advantage of this type of fertilizer is <br />' that it will not provide a large initial release of available nitrogen in the soil. The urea <br />~~ formaldehyde is gradually converted to an available form of nitrogen by soil bact~:ria. <br />SEED MIXTURE. The seed mixture shown in the following table was sown on all plots. <br />Small lots of seed were obtained with the assistance of Wendell Hassell of the <br />U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. The mixture contains five grasses and one <br />~ legume. Germination and purity test data were not available for all species, so seeding <br />rates were not calculated on a Pure Live Seed basis. A relatively high bulk seeding rate <br />(in terms of seeds per squaze foot) was used to accommodate anticipated low <br />gemtination and establishment by some of the grass species. Seed for each pl~~t was <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.