Laserfiche WebLink
The tree seedGn~noted were a mixture of Pinyon Pined Douglas Fir. Unlike the <br />tree plantings on the main quarry access roadside disturbances, Douglas Fir on this site <br />survived almost as well as the Pinyon and actually had a proportion to the Pinyon Pine similar <br />to the proportions planted. This means that Douglas Fir seedlings can survive on this slope <br />essentially as well as Pinyon Pine, if not better. Whereas on the roadside disturbances the <br />Douglas Fir plantings were almost a total failure and Pinyon Pine survived in large numbers, <br />along with Rocky Mountain Juniper. <br />Why this difference exists, cannot be directly determined. This site is west facing and <br />should be hotter and drier than the north facing slopes along the quarry access road. It could <br />have something to do with the nature of the soil microbiology. That is, if Douglas Fir is quite <br />sensitive to soil microbiology (some literature does indicate this may be the case), it might fail <br />to survive on the roadside disturbances where the microbiology has been very severely <br />disrupted. On the other hand, it might do quite well on this site where the primary damage <br />was to the surface vegetation and the soil microbiology was only slightly affected. It could <br />also be related to the amount and type of organic matter present, which would also relate to <br />microbiology. <br />At least a half dozen of the trees that had been severely damaged but not uprooted by <br />the rolling boulders, have developed significant regrowth. The regrowth is developing rapidly <br />and appears to be very healthy. It is expected that these damaged trees will eventually develop <br />into full size trees, but due to the damages inflicted by the rolling rocks, these trees will have <br />an unusual form. <br />Most of the depressions created by the rolling rocks are well vegetated with grasses and <br />some of them have shrubs beginning to encroach into the disturbance. Only the larger ones <br />are still very evident. Another year or two of growth will obscure those. No headword <br />erosion was seen in any of the depressions. <br />Grass growth in all disturbed areas on the slope is excellent. Only the very rocky scree <br />slopes, none of which were produced by the rock spillage, show weak growth. The grasses <br />covering the slope are a nice combination of those that were planted and the native species. <br />No locations were seen that contained grass growth that was intensely dominated by the seeded <br />grasses. Although to a botanist the grass community on the slope would exhibit a slightly <br />artificial character, to the layman the blend of introduced and native grasses would look quite <br />natural. <br />No photographs of the initial condition of the site were taken on the inspection, but it <br />appeared that the shrub cover had increased significantly in the last two to three years. This <br />could be an illusion produced by the much more dense grass growth around the shrubs. <br />Photographs were taken for comparison with earlier images. <br />It would be expected that in time shrub cover would increase significantly due to the <br />reduced competition from trees. This competition primarily came from the shade factor <br />produced by the trees and competition for water. With the removal of the trees, more <br />resources are available for the shrubs. The rate at which this increase in shrub cover would <br />occur, however, cannot be predicted with accuracy. Therefore, any real increase in shrub <br />cover will need to be determined by comparison to the previous photographs. <br />Page 2 of 3 1992 Annual Report Supplement M-77-210 Snyder t2uarry <br />