My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP00486
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP00486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:29:23 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:40:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/1/1985
Doc Name
DESERADO CERTIFICATION LETTERS
From
MLRD
To
MIKE LONG
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getches, Executive Director <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />February 1, 1985 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />T0: Mike Long <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Deserado~ <br />~.~~ <br />ion Letters <br />Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the three certification documents <br />you forwarded to me. I return the following comments for your consideration <br />in responding to the applicant. <br />Coal Processing Waste Bank Inspection Letter: <br />In general, the inspection form contains insufficient detail. The items <br />selected by the operator to be included in the form are each appropriate, but <br />they do not fulfill the overall requirements of Sections 4.10.2 and <br />4.09.1(11), included by reference by Rule 4.10. Further, the format of the <br />inspection report form does not provide sufficient background information to <br />support the preparer's observations (see attached letter, Dave Shelton to all <br />operators, dated July 13, 1984). <br />Railroad Fill Slooe Sediment Pond Calculations: <br />Providing that the appropriate hydrologic specialist concurs with the <br />operator's pond sizing projections, the certification document appears <br />sufficient to certify that the pond was constructed as depicted in the <br />attached as-built drawings. I am assuming that we have a set of original <br />drawings with original signatures. <br />As-built Drawings of Access and Haul Roads: <br />The purpose of the certification of roads is to attest that the roads were <br />built as approved. Therefore, this letter is not sufficient. I am assuming <br />that the drawings, which I have not personally examined, are each properly <br />stamped, signed, and carry a certification statement, stating that they <br />properly depict the actual as-built situation of the various roads. However, <br />Chief Engineer Weigrand's letter should clearly certify that the "as-built" <br />configuration of the roads conforms with the approved configuration or, if <br />they do not, it should clearly describe why they do not and refer to any <br />appropriate amendments. <br />Attahcments <br />/wjh <br />7426E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.