Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DMG Concern <br />2. Doubling of values was evident in the data tables for sites <br />800, 900, 16, 10 and 1002. <br />CYCC Response <br />~~ CYCC assumes that site "10" equates to Site "1003". Revised data <br />sheets are enclosed, and CYCC will attempt to prevent a recurrence <br />as discussed in the Foidel Creek AHR response. <br />DMG Concern <br />3. Sites 8, 307, 1002, and 69 datum elevations do not agree with <br />the table. <br />CYCC Response <br />The revised tables are enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />4. Please forward a copy of rating curves used for sites 1003, <br />69, 16, and 301. <br />\` CYCC Response <br />/~\`'~ Photocopies of the requested rating curves are enclosed. Please <br />J(Vy~ note that some curves reflect some 1993 data points, and as such <br />some degree of curve shift may be noted due to the high flows this <br />(1993) spring. Also, these curves also reflect the inclusion of <br />historic data points which aids in the assessment of curve trends <br />n~ over time (as previously discussed, these sites have shown little <br />~` shift up through the 1992 water year). If the Division has any <br />questions on these items, please feel free to contact us at your <br />convenience. <br />DMG Concern <br />Discharge and Pond Sites <br />1. Please submit the meter readings for site 115 and site 109 for <br />the Foidel Creek Mine for the 1992 water year. Include this <br />information as a standard portion of your AHR starting in <br />1993. <br />CYCC Response <br />/ The requested meter reading summary tables are enclosed. Please <br />~~ note that these items are being provided for Permit C-82-056, and <br />U are not a part of the reporting for the C-81-071 Permit. This <br />information will be provided as part of the C-82-056 AHR beginning <br />with the 1993 report. <br />\~~~ <br />