My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP00230
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP00230
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:29:10 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 9:36:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/9/1994
Doc Name
1993 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT MINE 3 C-84-062 COLO YAMPA COAL CO
From
DMG
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St , Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />Fnx:t~~lo¢~7~~cr 9, 1994 <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Co. koY ROmrr <br />29587 ROUtt CO. Rd. ~ 27 Governor <br />Oak Creek, CO. 80467 lames S. Luchhead <br />E.e<m rve Director <br />RE: 1993 Annual Hydrology Report, Mine No. 3, ,$C-84-062 M.<n,ele.tnn~; <br />Div.:ion Duecmr <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Co. <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />The Division received responses dated October 31, 1994 from CYCC <br />concerning our letter of June 15, 1994 for the 1993 Annual <br />Hydrology Report for Mine No. 3. These responses duplicate CYCC <br />efforts in the CYCC letter dated July 18, 1994. The letter of July <br />18th is from you where the letter dated October 31, 1994 is from <br />Ashley House, which may explain some of the confusion. In an <br />attempt to clarify the myriad of responses, I have reviewed my <br />letter of August 18, 1994 in addition to the other above-mentioned <br />adequacy letters and responses. The remaining or outstanding <br />Division concerns or comments are as follows: <br />A. Please indicate which point of the outside stream staff gauge <br />is surveyed. Provide a detailed explanation of how this value <br />is then used in conjunction with the monthly measurements to <br />arrive at both a stream elevation and a subsequent flow value. <br />B. After further review, it has become apparent that CYCC did <br />indeed follow established policy by submitting a request to <br />delay sampling for all bedrock wells for all Cyprus complex <br />wells, including Mine No. 3 until June of 1993. Documents <br />were discovered during an on-site record review at CYCC and <br />subsequent investigation at the Division offices confirmed <br />that correspondence was received. This type of action is <br />considered proper and acceptable. Please accept our apologies <br />for this oversight. <br />To summarize, please respond to item A above to close-out the 1993 <br />Mine No. 3 AHR review. <br />If you have questions, please call me. <br />Since~y,~ <br />Ken: ~ ~~~m <br />Env ronmental Protection Specialist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.