Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum to Harvey W. Curtis <br />June 14, 2006 <br />Page 7 <br />adjacent Ansley Pit, to document water levels and potential impacts along the western boundary. <br />The monitoring program should require measuring and recording water table levels at least monthly <br />all in five wells, and should include at least two seasons when the ground water table is expected to <br />be at its highest (spring). (Note: Depending on when the monitoring starts, it may miss this year's <br />high ground water table. To minimize this risk, the monitoring should start immediately. It should <br />continue until at least two high ground water seasons aze fully documented.) All data should be <br />reported to both the MLRB and the Objectors quarterly. The monitoring must be completed prior to <br />any exposure of ground water at the site. <br />5. Annlicant's statement: The applicant identified "Jack R. Allen and Susanne R. Allen" as the <br />owners of subsurface rights of the affected land in item 6 of the Constmction Materials Regulaz 111 <br />Operation Reclamation Pennit Application Form, dated February 3, 2006. <br />MLRB requirements: MLRB Rule 1.4.1(5)(c) requires that all application forms shall <br />contain the name of the Owner of the subsurface rights of the affected land. MLRB Rule <br />1.6.2(1)(e)(i) states that the applicant shall mail or personally serve a copy of the notice of the <br />application immediately after the fast publication to all Owners of Record of the surface and mineral <br />rights of the affected land. MLRB Rule 1.6(g) requires that, prior to Office consideration of the <br />application, proof of notice provided for in subparagraph 1.6.2(e) must be received by the Office. <br />"Owners of Record" is defined at § 1.1(34) as the owner or owners of a surface property interest <br />shown on the records of the County Assessor as of the date of filing. <br />Discussion: As evidenced by the Warranty Deed, executed between N.C. and Lora E. Cargill <br />and Paul A., Ethel R., and David L. Ansley, dated June 27, 1932, the Cargills reserved "one-half of <br />all oil, gas and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from the following described <br />land." The land includes the east half of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the <br />southwest quarter of the of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 11 and all of <br />Section 14, Township ] 0 South, Range 77 West of the 6s' P,M, which is the location of the northern <br />portion of the proposed Allen Pit site. This Warranty Deed was recorded July 18, 1963 at Book 180 <br />Page 135 of the Park County Clerk and Recorder's Office. (See Objectors' Exhibit 37). <br />The Park County Assessor's Office does not hold records of mineral rights owners, but clerks <br />at the Assessor's Office direct individuals who are seeking information on owners of mineral rights <br />to obtain such information from the Park County Clerk and Recorder's Office. Pursuant to Rule <br />1.6.2.1(e)(i), the applicant should have asked the Assessor's Office about owners of record of the <br />mineral rights of the affected land. The Assessor's Office would have directed the applicant to the <br />Clerk and Recorder's Office where the applicant would have obtained a copy of the 1963 Warranty <br />Deed which shows that the Cargills are the Owners of Record of the mineral rights of the proposed <br />Allen Fit site. <br />This information would also have been available to anyone making even a cursory check of <br />the title information. It clearly showed on the 1963 title that one-half of the mineral rights had been <br />reserved to the Cargills. Therefore, upon being informed that the Assessor's Office does not keep <br />records of minerals rights owners, another reasonable response would have been to check the title <br />information. <br />Conclusions: The applicant did not provide notice of the application to the Cargills <br />immediately after the first publication of the application. Therefore, the notice requirements have not <br />LEONARD RICE ENGINEERS. INC. <br />