My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE139550
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE139550
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:42:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 8:44:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/2/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Comments
From
DRMS cmr
To
Carder Inc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
interest in the structure, that the applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to <br />the structure; or <br />(b) Where such an agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall provide an appropriate <br />engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by <br />activities occurring at the mining operation. <br />(c) Where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized letter, on utility <br />letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining and reclamation activities, as <br />proposed, will have "no negative effect" on their utility. <br />6.5 GEOTECHNICAL STABILITY EXHIBIT <br />This section may be adequate as submitted. This adequacy determination depends on submission <br />of additional information on the mining operations requested above, especially as regards permanent man- <br />made structures. <br />Per Rule 1.6.5 "Within ten (10) working days after the last publication or as soon thereafter as proof has <br />been obtained, the Applicant shall mail proof of the publication required by Rule 1.6.2(1)(d) to the <br />Division", this proof of publication has not yet been received. <br />Given the extensive nature of the adequacy responses that the applicant will need to provide to the <br />Division, the Division will require the Applicant to provide a complete revised application once all the <br />adequacy issues have been addressed. <br />I look forward to your response. Please allow adequate time for review before the October 9, 2006 <br />decision date. Rule 1.8.1 states that changes and additions to the permit application must be filed with the <br />Division and the County Clerk and Recorder. The applicant must also provide the Division with an <br />affidavit or receipt demonstrating that the change or addition was filed with the County Clerk and Recorder <br />no later than the close of business on the day the change was filed with the Division. If needed, the <br />Applicant can, at any time, request an extension of the permit decision date. <br />Please contact me at (303) 866-4922 if you have any questions <br />Sincere y~~\~ <br />ns Rowe <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Carl Mount - DRMS <br />Tony Waldron - DRMS <br />Janet Kieler Water Quality Control Division Permit Section <br />Attachments: Crowley County Commissioners August 1, 2006 office comments <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife August 22, 2006 comments <br />Colorado Historical Society August 1, 2006 comments <br />State Engineers Office July 14, 2006 comments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.