My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE139435
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE139435
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:40:16 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 8:40:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/14/1985
From
MLRD
To
COLOWYO COAL CO
Section_Exhibit Name
Gulch A sed pond
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-16- <br />Mr. Richcrd Atkinson <br />~ May la, 19a1 <br />Pcge Tv+o <br />h <br />by use of the formula given in Hoan and Earfield: <br />D = DA DV DC DP <br />where: <br />D =delivery factor <br />DA =area factor <br />DV = vegetative factor <br />DC =.chanr.elization fcctor <br />DP = pit factor <br />For D we had used factors from 0.27 to 0.30 taken from figure 5.23 on pege 223, <br />HoanAand ecrfield; D had been computed ct betv+een 0.12 to 0.13, but used in <br />the equation et 0.60 cue to stated limitation that the rrc~uct.cf DpD should be <br />at least equal to the lower of D cr D for namcl veg='=lion. Values of 1.0 <br />hed been used for factors DC erd DP in the formui_ , <br />• In revie•r+ cf the literature, disNSSiors v+ilQ cl`~s •++aricina v+ith sedimentology <br />in Colorado crid with hhr. Domigue.we cc r.cluc_ ;,._~ in light of the limited know- <br />ledce in 4'Jestern v,ntersheds that it is eppror.ricte cra cnsen•a:ive to use values <br />less than .1 for only the area factor and to use 1 for the ether 3 factors in the I'aan <br />and Earfield formula, With this a_sumption the recampulad sediment delivery ratios <br />compered with the previous sediment delivery ratios for the mining area detention <br />ponds are: <br />Sediment Delivery Patio <br />Detention Pond Previous Cclculation Revised Calwletion <br />Tcylor Gulch Tributcry 0.17 0.26 <br />Streeter Gulch 0.16 0.25 <br />Gulch A 0.18 0.29 <br />The effect of the revised sediment delivery ratios on the calculated sediment yield <br />end pond designs is discussed at the conclusion of the response to USI_E CP Facta s. <br />3. USLE CP 1=ectcrs: The Adequacy Review questioned the selection of C factor <br />for strow mu c ing from USDA Technical Note 50. The selected value from tF~is <br />publi~tion v+as C = 0.02 for a tons of straw mulching per acre. The soil loss v:cs <br />then computed using this value of C at 3.17 tons per acre per year. Next the <br />total sediment yield for 3 years v+as computed for each of the sedimentation ponds <br />• by converting tons of sediment to acre feet of sediment and multiplying by the <br />drainage area of each pond and by 3 years. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.