My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE138966
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE138966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:39:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 8:13:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY LETTER FOR TIGER TIMBER EXPANSION SITE PN M-91-082
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY LETTER <br />for <br />TIGER TI11lBER EXPANSION SITE <br />PERMIT NO. 61-91-082 <br />Responses are to Adequacy Items dated December 16, 1991 - copy attached. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />Item 2: Regarding ownership of structures on site relative to ownership oP <br />surface. <br />RESPONSE: The structures on site are all associated with the sawmill operation. <br />These structures are owned by Tiger Timber, Inc.. Ownership is <br />indicated on Exhibits E-1 and E-2. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />Item 2: Regarding the saving oP topsoil 2 inches or greater in thickness. <br />RESPONSE: Where topsoil exists to a depth of 2 inches or greater the soil will <br />be salvaged and stockpiled for subsequent use In the reclam:~tion oP <br />the site. <br />Item 7: Regarding the dimensions of existing roads. <br />RESPONSE: Dimensions are shown on Exhibits E-1 and E-2. These ros~ds will <br />be used during the operation and reclamation. Please note that the <br />main entrance road is primarily used to serve the sawmill operation <br />and its use for gravel haulage is secondary. No improvements are <br />planned for these roads other than normal maintenance. <br />Item 9: (First paragraph) Regarding runoff to the West and the South Prom <br />disturbed areas in the Western portion of the operation. <br />RESPONSE: Due to the small drainage area that would supply these locations <br />along the permit boundary the volume oP water will be quite small <br />in most storm events. We believe that maintaining a berm or silt <br />fence Inside the boundary should be sufficient to retain the runoff <br />on site and/or release the water slowly to downslope ]ands. It <br />should be recognized that it is not so much the water runnl.ng out <br />of the permit that is the problem, but sediment the water might <br />carry. Water running Prom this land to adjacent lands has been <br />occurring throughout history. Therefore, a berming or silt fencing <br />should control most of the sediment problem. A silt fence <br />constructed oP either hay bales or conventional silt fence fabric <br />would probably control sediment the best. The location oP these are <br />shown on Exhibits E-1 and E-2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.