Laserfiche WebLink
I5. "In a ~C-.,yuare mile radius there are numero~!s sites of ti~is tyNc v:hich tniiy questions the demand and experience <br />of dealing with the business operation." <br />(11'lichae/Decker; February l6, 200/) <br />16. "1[ will create excessive noise and dust, cause pollution from the trucks and machinery and create an enormous <br />amount of traffic on my quiet dirt road." <br />(Beth Decker; February !6, 2001) <br />17. "My property value will also be affected negatively." <br />(Beth Decker; Febr:~ary !6, 2001) <br />ISSUES THAT WERE RASED AFTER THE INITIAL COMMENT PERIOD THAT THE DIVISION <br />BEL/EVES ARE NOT WITH/N THE JURISDICTION OF THE DIVISION OR BOARD <br />18. "We understand the applicant's right to mine [he gravel on his property similar [o what we may eventually <br />propose. We do not understand the need or right for the other related asphalt batch plant and recycling <br />operations and the applicant hasn't been clear around his business purposes for the expanded operations. The <br />applicant indicated a current problem with excessive concrete spoils at their Denver operation and we are <br />concerned about our neighborhood being negatively impacted by t}tis part of the proposed operation." <br />(Marty Block- XCEL ENERGY, March 9, 2001) <br />19. "The DMG or Weld County should have a comprehensive approach for planning the gravel mining in this <br />portion of Weld County." <br />(Marty Block- XCEL ENERGY, March 9, 2001) <br />20. "The applicant will generate considerable truck Vaffic on roads adjacent to our plant, which may affect the <br />safety of our employees and conVactors." <br />(Marty Block- XCEL ENERGY; March 9, 2001) <br />21. "Hwy 66 should be improved to accommodate this traffic and the increasing traffic associated with [he growth <br />in the area." <br />(Marty Block- XCEL ENERGY; March 9, 2001) <br />