My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE138205
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE138205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:38:49 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 7:15:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/1/2003
Doc Name
Sediment Pond SEDCAD Results
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment 13-5B Appendix 1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1 <br />Typica{ physical and mechanical properties for common soils (extracted from Lambe and <br />Whitman, 1969; Simons et al., 1978; Abramson et al., '1996). <br /> Angle of <br /> Unified Cohesion Internal Unit Weight Unit Weight <br /> group (c), Friction Imy, Dry, Wet, <br />Typical soil names symbol psf (kPa) degrees pcf (t/m3) pcf (Vm'! <br />Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand GW - 38.3 83-118 84-136 <br />mixtures, little or no fines 11.3-1.9) (1.3-2.2) <br />Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand GP - 36.5 - - <br />mixtures, little or no fines <br />Silty gravels, poorly graded GM 0-50 33.8 89-146 90-155 <br />gravel-sand-silt mixtures (0-2.4) {1.4-2.3) (1.4-2.5) <br />Clayey gravels, poorly graded GC 0-100 31.0 100-148 125-156 <br />gravel-sand-clay mixtures 10-4.8) (1.6-2.4) (2.0-2.5) <br />Wel! graded sands, gravelly SW - 37.6-39.0 87-127 88.142 <br />sands, little or no fines 11.4-2.0) (1.A-2.3) <br />Poorly graded sands, gravelly SP - 35.8-37.2 84-140 115-151 <br />sands, little or no fines (1.3-2.2) (1.8-2.4) <br />Silty sands, poorly graded SM 0-50 30.6-36.1 - - <br />sand-silt mixtures (0-2.4) <br />Clayey sands, poorly graded SC 0-100 27.9-33.8 - - <br />sand-clay mixtures (0-4.8) <br />Inorganic silts and very fine ML 0-100 30.1-33.4 BO-116 81-136 <br />sands, silty or clayey fine sands (0-4.8) (1.3-1.9) (1.3-2.2) <br />with slight plasticity <br />Inorganic clays of low to CL 0-400 26.6-30.1 60-135 100-147 <br />medium plasticity. gravelly clays, (0-19.2) (1.0.2.1) (1.6-2.4) <br />sandy clays, siky clays - <br />Organic silts and organic silt-clays OL 0-200 - - - <br />of low plasticity (0-9.6) ~ _ <br />Inorganic silts, micaceous or MH 0-200 22.9-27.5 76-120 77-138 <br />diatomaceous tine sandy or silty 10-9.6) (1.2-1.9) 11.2.2.2) <br />soils, elastic silts <br />Inorganic clays of high plasticity, CH 0-500 74.6.23.8 50-112 94-133 <br />fat clays (0-23.91 (0.8-1.81 (1.5-2.11 <br />Organic clays of medium to OH 0-400 - 30-100 61-125 <br />high plasticity 10-19.2) (0.5-1.6) (1.3-2.0) <br />Peat and other highly organic soils Pt - - 40-110 87-131 <br /> (0.6-1.5) (1.4-2.U <br />subsidence and horizontal displacement at a point on <br />slope surface caused by the extraction of the element in <br />the coal seam become <br /> <br />By integrating Eqs. (2) and (3) throughout the <br />"mined" area, the mathematical expressions for the final <br />subsidence and horizontal displacement at a point of in- <br />terest on slope surface can be obtained as <br />S'=S+Gsina V (4) <br />U' = U + G cosa Y (5) <br />and <br />V = S sin a + U cosa (6) <br />where <br />•~ S and U are the final subsidence and horizontal displace- <br />ment at the point on a flat surface, respectively. <br />Sand U can be predicted with good confidence using the <br />current technologies. <br />It should be noted that the product of G V in Eqs . <br />(4) and (5) is the total incremental movement caused by <br />the topographical effect of the surface natural slope. The <br />model also shows that [he final movement on a slope <br />surface consists of two parts: that on a flat surface and an <br />incremental amount induced by topographical effect. <br />The incremental movement can be readily determined <br />once the proportionality coefficient (G) is given. A ten- <br />tative method for determining G has been given (Luo, <br />1989). However, this method was only able to consider <br />the surface natural slope as its independent variable. <br />even though a later study showed that the natural slope <br />is indeed one of the important facmrs (Luo and et aL, <br />1996}. It has long been speculated that G could be de- ~ <br />pendent on the slope geometry (i.e., slope angle and <br />depth of soii layer), physical and mechanical properties ~, <br />(i.e., density, moisture content, cohesion and angle of in- <br />ternal friction) of the soil layer. However, a rational re- <br />lationship between G and the mentioned factors has not <br />been established before. <br />II f <br />MINING ENGINEERING ^ JUNE 1999 '101 I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.