My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137872
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:38:29 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 6:40:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
LOADOUTS SMALL AREA EXEMPTIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 1993 Raton Creek ' Smal! Ana Exemption • 1 <br />• for deterioration and evidence of effective sediment control. If there is evidence of significan[ <br />sediment transpor[ through or around the sediment traps, installations will be modified. <br />The amount of sediment fence surface area required to safely pass the peak discharge from a 10- <br />year, 24-hour event was determined as follows: <br />Sediment Fence Permissivity: <br />15 gal/min/ft= or 0.033 cfs/ftz <br />Required Surface Area: <br />Upper Fence <br />Lower Fence <br />0.6 cfs / 0.033 cfs/EtZ = 18 ft' <br />1.8 cfs / 0.033 cfs/ftt = 54 ft' <br />The flow rates used for the fence design was based on flows calculated. The ditch design (see <br />Addendum D). <br />The required length of fences should be calculated assuming a Flow depth of 1 foot. Attual <br />fence installation should be a minimum of 1.5 feet to allow free board and a factor of safety on <br />the permissivity. <br />The silt fence should be installed in accordance with the manufactures recommendations. <br />Designs assume regular inspections and main[enance. <br />Given the limited size of the disturbed area, [he previously discussed drainage and sediment <br />control measures (designed to effectively prevent significant adverse downstream water quality <br />impacts), and the lack of any underground mine water discharge source, EFMC requests DMG <br />approval of small area exemptions for [his site. <br />Ditch TS-2 will extend from the center of the west side of the topsoil stockpile, around the <br />north side of the pile, joining Ditch TS-1 at the lower end of the middle segmen[. Flow <br />velocities for all designed segments of both Ditches TS-1 and TS-2 are below critical velocities <br />so no supplemental erosion control will be required. <br />The access road for the trailer area slopes to the east toward Ditch TS-1, so the majority of [he <br />drainage from both the road and trailer pad will flow to this ditch following existing gradients. <br />In order, however, to prevent any drainage from the trailer pad from discharging to the west, <br />a 2-foot high berm, approximately 100 feet long will be established and maintained on the west <br />edge of the trailer pad as shown on Map 12, Mine Site Water Systems and Refuse Area. <br />Design calculations for Watershed Diversion 5 and Topsoil Containment Ditches TS-1 and TS-2 <br />follow [his small area exemption request and all existing and proposed drainage struc[ures are <br />shown on Map 12, Mine Site Water Systems and Refuse Area. <br />Given the limited size of the trailer/stockpile disturbance area (total disturbance of <br />approximately 0.95 acres), the previously discussed drainage and sediment control measures <br />which will effecively prevent significant adverse downstream water quality impacts, and the lack <br />. of any underground mine water discharge sources in the immediate vicinity, EFMC respectfully <br />requests DMG approval of a small azea exemption for this area. <br />A:~856BTRO7.pGS <br />n/:v9s to,m TerraMatrix/ACZ lnc. ' P.O. Bos 7740!8 • Steamboat Springx Colorado 80477 • (303J 8796160 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.