Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l J <br />• <br />Compaction <br />Test Report <br />CLIENT BASIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />14300 HIGHWAY 12 <br />WESTON, COLORADO 81091 <br />® CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL <br />AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS <br />DgiE _ _ _09/21/95 . Loe No __22905_ <br />REPORRdO _ _. _ 3 SHEET _ .1 OF _. _2 _- <br />$ue~FCr FIELDDENSffYTESTS <br />REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA <br /> UBORATORY FIELD <br />TEST <br />NO. <br />LOUTION DEPTH <br />FEET <br /> <br />1 7EST <br />ttPE MA% <br />DENSITY <br />PCF OMC <br />.. DRY <br />DENSIFY <br />PCF MC <br />,. COM~ <br />FACTION <br />SOIL TYPE <br /> CURVE NO <br />5 <br /> - . <br />_ <br /> CURVE NO <br />5 <br /> . <br />. <br /> CURVE NO <br />5 <br /> - --- _ <br />. <br />- <br /> CURVE <br />NO <br />6 <br /> _ <br />. <br />. <br />- <br /> CURVE N0 <br />6 <br /> .. <br />- <br /> - CURVE NO <br />6 <br /> - ._ <br />__ <br /> CURVE NO <br />7 <br /> . <br /> CURVE <br />NO <br />7 <br /> . <br />. <br />- <br />T ELEVATION IN F$T <br />SPECIFICATIONS:-9O %OFMAXIMUM-ASTM D 69B - <br />MOISIURE WITHIN __ o OF OPTIMUM <br />ryPE OF COMPgCiION E9UIPMENi AND NO.OF UNIi$. <br />.(1 )D9 DOZER <br />MOISNRE ADDED BY <br />MICKNE55 OF LIFT <br />iVPE Of EAR1H MOVING EOUIPMENi AND NO Of UNliS~ <br />(1)D9.DOZER.(2)END PUMP-TRUCKS- <br />INCHES <br />THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED A$ A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATON <br />OF FILL PLgCEMENi, A$WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED <br />UPON THE CONTRACTOR i0 APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACIOE EFFORT AND <br />MOISTURE iO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURNG TIMES WHEN OUR <br />OBSERVER .5 NOi PRESENT. AND Ai LOCATIONS OMER iT•AN THOSE TESTED <br />IESI DATA ME NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS <br />$PECIFlCA710N5. <br />PROGRESS REPORT ,~ REQUESTED WE VISTiED THE SiTE TODAY AND PERFORMED FIELD DENSITY TESTING ON FILL <br />PLACED IN THREE SEPARATE AREAS. TESTS 20 TO 22 WERE PERFORMED IN FILL PLACED AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE <br />RDA. TESTS 23 TO 25 WERE PERFORMED AT THE DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE AT THE NEW ELK MINE. TESTS 26 <br />TO 29 WERE PERFORMED IN FILL PLACED IN THE NEW ELK RDA. AT THE TIME OF OUR SfTE VISR, A LARGE <br />PORTION OF THE NEW ELK RDA WAS BEING PROCESSED AND WAS WET AND NOT READY FOR TREATING. ELEVATIONS <br />WERE PROVIDED BY BUDDY GORDON WITH BASIN RESOURCES. <br />^ IN OUR OPINION FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFIUTIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSFRVATIONSAND TEST N0.151_ <br />^ IN OUR OPINION FILL COMPACTION DOES NOi MEET SPECIFIUTIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO <br />AND SHOULD BE REWORKED <br />SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: ^ FULL TIME; [~PERIODIC.ON CALL BASIS; [X CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE, <br />CTL/THOMPSON INC. <br />FIELD REPRESENIAfM: <br />MARK G. GRAY, P.E. <br />PW:TW <br />