Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• <br />• <br />Compaction <br />Test Report <br />cuSNr BASIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />14300 HIGHWAY 12 <br />WESTON, COLORADO 81091 <br />® CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL <br />AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS <br />D.+rE - 08/27/95 roe No _ 22905 __ __ <br />REPORINO _ _. 2 SHEET 1 OF 2- _- <br />sus~ECr FIELD DENSITY TESTS <br /> UBORATORY FIELD <br />TEST DEPTN TEST MAK OMC DRV MC COM- <br />NO. LOCATION FEET TYPE DENSITY a DENSITY .o PACTIO SOIL TYPE <br /> PCF PCf e <br /> 1 <br /> CURVE NO. 2 <br />9 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6921 NUC 113.0 9.0 121.0 13.0 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> _-__ ___.___ _ _ _ CURVE NO. 2 <br />10 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6922 NUC 113.0 9.0 121.0 4.3 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> __ _ CURVE NO. 2 <br />11 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6920 NUC 113.0 9.0 114.0 7.5 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW- ELK MINE CURVE NO. 3 <br />12 DEVELOPMEM WAST PILE 7225 NUC 88.5 10.0 96.0 7.5 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK MINE___ _ CURVE-NO_3 _ <br />13 DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE 7230 NUC 88.5 10.0 91.0 3.7 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK MINE -_ CURVE NO. 3 _ <br />14 DEVELOPMEM WASTE PILE 7235 NUC 88.5 10.0 88.0 9.1 99 JOB N0.22905 <br /> CURVE NO. 4 <br /> <br />15 _ _ _ __ <br />NEW ELK RDA <br />7365 <br />NUC <br />99.0 <br />9.5 <br />106.0 <br />9.5 <br />100 _ <br />JOB N0.22905 <br /> _ CURVE NO. 4 <br />16 NEW ELK RDA 7393 NUC 99.0 9.5 105.0 6.2 100 JOB N0.22905 <br />T ELEY'A110N IN F$T <br />SPECIFICATIONS:- 90- °o OF MPJ(IMUM ASTNI_D 698_ <br />MOISTURE WITHIN - - ;b OF OPTIMUA4 <br />TYPE OF COMPACTION FOUIPMENi AND NO OF UNU$. <br />MOISTURE ADDED BY <br />iHICkNE550F LIFT <br />NPE OF EHf7iH MOVING E9UIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS <br />THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVAROrI <br />OF FIIL PLACEMENT AS WELI AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE VJE HAVE RELIED <br />UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSAi7Y COMPACirh EFFORT AND <br />MOISNRE i0 ACHIEVE SPEUHED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR <br />OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCARONS OTHER 41AN 1HOSE TESTED <br />TEST DATA ARE NOT rHE SOLE gASI$ FOR OPINONS ONblHETHER THE FILL MEE75 <br />SPECIFICATIONS. <br />PROGRESS REPORr AS RE4UESTED, WE PERFORMED FIELD DENSITY TESTS AT THE REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA (RDA) AT <br />THE GOLDEN EAGLE MINE (PESTS 9 THROUGH 11), THE DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE Ai THE NEW ELK MINE (TE51S <br />12 THROUGH 14), AND THE RDA AT THE NEW ELK MINE (TESTS 15 THROUGH 19). ELEVATIONS OF THE TESTS <br />LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED BY BUDDY GORDON OF BASIN RESOURCES WRH AN ALTIMETER. <br />^ IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST N0.151 _ <br />^ IN OUR OPINION. FIIL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO 15~ - <br />AND SHOUID BE REWORKED <br />SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: ^ FULL TIME: [X PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS: X CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATNE ADVISED <br />PAUL WIGGS <br />HEAD PE~REEENIAirvF <br />PW:MW <br />CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />BUDDY GORDON <br />(BASIN RESOURCES) <br />coor.0„FD ev MARK G. GRAY, P.E. <br />