Laserfiche WebLink
West EJk Mine <br />If surface cracks were to form and if they were to intercept stock ponds or ephemeral channels, they <br />could potentially intercept surface water. Field evidence at the Section 17 cracks, evaluation of the <br />soft plastic shales occurring in the Barren Member above the F-Seam, and theoretical subsidence <br />stress-strain relationships discussed elsewhere in the subsidence section of the application, each <br />strongly suggest that surface cracks would not extend to any great depth. <br />Two factors will also tend to heal the cracks, if they were to intercept water. First, the shales of the <br />Mesaverde Formation aze known to have shrink-swell capacity. If the satttration of these shales <br />were to be increased, they would swell and this could be expected to help heal the crack. Secondly, <br />Mr. Jeff Hynes of the Colorado Geological Survey (1994) has stated that a greater factor in crack <br />healing would be increases in the the plasticity of the shales as water saturations were increased. <br />Simply stated, as the shales become wetter, they soften and will squeeze into and heal the cracks. <br />An important consideration regazding mining in the Apache Rocks permit revision area is potential <br />impacts to the Minnesota Reservoir. The water rights implications of mining in the tributary azea to <br />the reservoir aze discussed later in Section 2.05.6 (3)(b)(iii & viii) Water Rights. MCC has <br />committed to maintaining a buffer zone between active mining and the dam of at least 700 feet, <br />which is greater than the distance utilizing the conservative angle of draw 25 degrees. With a <br />setback of this mazgin, there is no risk of either a crack developing under the reservoir or <br />aggravation of the existing structwal problems with the dam as a result of MCC's mining activities. <br />Wetlands <br />,~ Based upon inspection of conventional and infra-red aerial photographs and reconnaissance-level <br />field investigation, the wetlands in the permit area aze confined primarily to manmade stockponds <br />in the drainages. They aze intermittent in nature. Very few "natural" riparian wetlands aze evident. <br />The total wetlands acreage in the permit azea is approximately 7 acres (as defined by the U.5. Army <br />Corps of Engineers (USAGE). Field surveys conducted in August 1995 verified this estimate. An <br />additional2 to 3 acres lies above the l ONE and 11 NE longwall panels. <br />Although most of the wetlands aze found in drainage channels, there are small, isolated wetlands on <br />the hillsides where springs and seeps emerge. There aze other isolated wetlands in association with <br />landslides and slumps. In these instances, the wetlands are associated with the uppermost portion <br />of the landslide/slump, where a relatively flat area has been created and water has tended to collect <br />and saturate the soils. <br />Impacts to wetlands are regulated under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Section 404, <br />and the accompanying regulations (including, in particular, the 404(b)(1) Guidelines) indicate that <br />proposed activities which result in dredging and/or filling regulatory wetlands need to obtain a <br />Section 404 permit prior to commencement of the activity. To qualify as a "regulatory wetland," <br />the land in question must meet specific requirements pertaining to vegetation, soils and hydrology. <br />As of Mazch 1995, the criteria for these three parameters were being closely reviewed by the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and a <br />technical committee of the National Science Foundation. <br />2.05-167 Revised Jun. /995 PR06: Revised Nov. 1998TR80:1/98 PR08 <br />