Laserfiche WebLink
Coal Methane Drainage Project - PaneG 1G24 Wert E!k Mine • Page 3-12 <br />more intensive management systems have keen implemented. Within the project azea, stringer <br />meadows and riparian habitats are the highest productivity habitats. These habitats have a large <br />number of palatable woody plants and high yield and diversity of grasses and forbs. Elk and livestock <br />both favor these habitats and localized areas can show signs of relatively high use. <br />The project area has been mapped by the CDOW as elk winter range. Forest Plan designated <br />Management Area SA, Big Game Winter Range, occurs within and adjacent to the project azea. The <br />south and southwest facing slopes and drainages are most likely to be used during mild winters. <br />Transition and winter range on National Forest lands, private lands, and BLM are generally in a <br />declining condition due to natural aging (lack of disturbance has resulted in forage and browse in a <br />mature, decadent stage) and the effects of human development in some of the most productive range <br />sites. <br />Human activities within the analysis area are highest doting the big game hunting seasons (August <br />through October). Human activities in proximity to the area have included road and trail <br />construction in conjunction with coal exploration and mining since the late 1960's, grazing on the <br />Dry Fork allotment, operation of the Minnesota Reservoir and Deep Creek ditch system, and recent <br />methane drainage activities beginning in spring of 2001. Widespread use of ATV's in the last 10 years <br />has resulted in user-created roads and trails and an overall increase in road and trail densities. These <br />routes often run along drainages or ridges, which are important elk travel corridors and security azeas. <br />Moderate levels of human activity occur in the Minnesota Creek drainage. USFS traffic counter data <br />from 1998 -2000 indicates use in the analysis area is ]ow to moderate in summer months, then <br />doubles during September and October. In 2000 there was an overall decrease in use of the azea <br />from 1999. Some of the decrease in use may be attributed to MCC activities in the azea. Summer use <br />of the area is expected to increase as the community of Paonia continues to grow and residents use <br />public lands for recreation. <br />Human activity on public lands can cause elk to move to lower elevations earlier than normal <br />(CDOW 1990). Studies indicate that elk respond to human activity by moving out of active drainages <br />to other portions of their home range. This behavior is more pronounced the longer the duration of <br />the activity. Big game impacts can be seduced by confinung activities to a single drainage at a time, <br />completing the activities in the shortest time possible, and scheduling activities during periods when <br />elk are not present. Displacement of elk from public to private lands reduces hunting opportunities <br />and creates conflicts with landowners and livestock. Displacement from selected habitats over time is <br />a serious impact to elk. <br />Vehicle trafFc on forest roads establishes a pattern of habitat use in which areas nearest the road aze <br />not fully utilized by elk. With only two miles of road per squaze mile, more than half of the available <br />elk habitat can be affected (Lyon, 1983). Currently, road densities are approximately 2.2 miles per <br />square mile within the cumulative analysis azea and 4.35 miles per square mile within the project azea. <br />During the hunting seasons elk seek security areas where geography, topography, vegetation, or a <br />combination of these factors, will hold elk under the stress of hunting. The effectiveness of these <br />areas is influenced by their size, type of cover, topographic chazacteristics, and distance from roads. <br />Potential elk security areas occur in the Sunset Trail, Coal Creek Mesa, Muddy Fork, and Ravens <br />Gulch areas. Elk populations within the boundaries of the West Elk Data Analysis Unit (DAU) E-52, <br />which includes CDOW Game Management Units 53 and 54, averaged around 4,176 for the last five <br />years. The current CDOW population objective for this DAU is 2,350 elk. <br />Mule deer are found throughout the genera] azea in both forested and open shrub habitats such as <br />oakbrush, sagebrush, and mixed browse habitats. The CDOW has mapped this area as summer range <br />for mule deer. Mule deer fawning occurs neat the upper limits of their winter range, in lower <br />elevation brush fields, and forest ecotones. No sped&c fawning grounds have been identified in the <br />project area. Winter range for mule deer is no[ mapped within the analysis azea. Current deer <br />If:VT/MU+v~G9GlEI/Oi.Jr )la/oS~l UJFr <br />3/JlO),b <br />EnvironmentolA.rreuraent <br />r <br />C <br /> <br /> <br />