Laserfiche WebLink
Cool Metbame DraimaRe Project - PaneG 76-24 Wert E(k Mime • Paye 3-00 <br />3.1.2.8 Public AN Use Option <br />Under the Public ATV Option, continued long-term ATV access on the West Flatiron, West Bench, <br />and East Bench roads would result in continuing use and minor ongoing erosion and sedimentation <br />effects from these trails on adjacent drainages and pazticularly where the trails (West Flatiron) cross <br />drainages or riparian areas. <br />3.1.3 Cumulative Effects <br />The planned sequence for the drilling starts in panels 16, 17, and 17S in 2002, progressing into panels <br />21 through 24 in years 2003 and 2004, and finishing in panels 18 through 20 in the years 2005 and <br />2006. Panel 17S is not currently scheduled to be mined until 2016. There is slight potential for this <br />panel to be mined in the next 5 years. No or negligible cumulative effects are anticipated relative to <br />geology and ground water, since direct and indirect effects are negligible. Cumulative impacts relative <br />to surface water and riparian resources would increase over the duration of the project due to <br />increases in total dismrbance area, then reduce after 2008 as zevegetation of disturbed azeas reduces <br />sedimentation and erosion. Initially, the potential impacts would occur in the southern portion of the <br />area, progressing to the north. Since all of the azea drainages aze tributary to the North Fork, <br />increasing surface disturbance would have the potential to incrementally increase sediment <br />contributions to the North Fork. As noted in Section 3.1.2.1, however, proposed mitigation and <br />monitoring measures would genezally be effective in preventing or limiting so$ loss, erosion, and <br />sedimentation. Proposed progressive reclamation of surface disturbance azeas would also be effective <br />in minimi>ing the potential for cumulative impacts by limiting the overall disturbance at any given <br />point in time. <br />Any large-scale future development activity (i.e.: coal exploration, leasing, future methane drainage, <br />future mining, future methane gas development) would be subject to the same or similar <br />environmental analysis, permitting, and mitigation requirements as the project proposal. These <br />safeguazds would tend to prevent or limit potential cumulative effects. <br />3.2 WILDLIFE <br />For wildlife resources, the project impact azea is the project area. The cumulative impact azea is a <br />lazger area of approximately 18,940 acres on the north flank of Mount Gunruson, which encompasses <br />big game ranges to the south and east of the project area. <br />3.2.1 Affected Environment <br />The azea on the north flank of Mount Gunnison includes a number of tributaries that drain north <br />into the North Fork of the Gunnison River and southwest into Minnesota Creek. There aze several <br />perennial streams (Ravens Gulch, Deep Creek, Box Canyon, Sylvester Gulch, Lone Pine Gulch, and <br />Horse Gulch) in the area, however, none aze known to support fisheries. Elevations in the <br />cumulative impact area range from 7,400 feet to 10,000 feet, and in the project area, from 7,400 to <br />8,600 feet. Vegetative cover types from the flank of Mount Gunnison to the lower elevation azeas <br />range from small stringers of spruce-fir and pure aspen forest, to large expansive areas of Gambel oak <br />mixed with pockets of aspen. The upper mesas are dominated by grass meadows interspersed with <br />sagebrush. Forest communities associated with steep, incised drainages such as Deep Creek and <br />Ravens Gulch are composed of Engelmann spruce-fir, Douglas fu and blue spruce. Riparian habitat <br />in Sylvester Gulch and Box Canyon is composed of mixed woodland species, such as nazrowleaf <br />cottonwood, aspen, box elder, Rocky Mountain maple, and mountain ash. Riparian communities <br />associated with intemuttent or ephemeral drainages contain mountain meadow grass/forb and carex <br />species, and in some azeas, an aspen overstory. Succession in the oak habitat type is strongly <br />influenced by fire. This area bums on a 15-25 year ryde. Fire frequency has declined in the past 100 <br />yeazs, therefore, most of the oak is mature and dense. The majority of oak habitat within the analysis <br />P!IGP/Nwra. ('G/F I/D~ ilJ/OSEI Vhf <br />J/J/Ol dv <br />Environmental Auurment <br />LI <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />