Laserfiche WebLink
Coal Me(hane Droina,Qe Project - Pane6 1G-24 Wett Elk Mine <br /> <br />3.1.2.2 Effects Common To Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 <br />3-7 <br />Soil removal, stockpiling, and replacement, along with consequent compaction and erosion would <br />change soil characteristics in affected areas. Although disturbed areas can be reclaimed and <br />rehabilitated, the soil productivity will be changed Erom its natural state. <br />In Alternative 2, 3, and 4, approximately 54 temporary drill pads would be constructed for drilling and <br />operation of 70 MDWs. Drill pad surface areas would typically be approximately 0.5 acres and <br />construction related disturbance for each pad would average approximately 0.7 acres (0.5 w/40 <br />percent additional for cut/fill). Surface disturbance for drill pads would be approximately 37.8 acres. <br />Geologic hazard mapping indicates that 13 drillholes on 7 drill pads and two road segments would be <br />located in or adjacent to high geologic hazazd areas, where surface occupancy and use would be <br />precluded or restricted under the NSO stipulation for high geologic hazards. Table T3, Drill Pad <br />Stipulation Effects Summary, and Table T4, Road Stipulation Effects Summary, display the affected <br />drill pads and roads. <br />Short segments of several access roads cross steep slope areas. .Most of these segments aze on <br />existing roads and the segments crossing steep slopes aze short. Proposed roads or road segments <br />would also cross moderate slope areas. These locations aze displayed on Map 1, Project Area <br />Activities With Surface Stipulations. Road locations would be checked in the field by USFS personnel <br />and if any changes or improvements are made to an existing road that crosses the steep slope areas, <br />the steep slope stipulation would apply. If a proposed new road were proposed to cross a steep slope <br />area, consideration would be given to adjusting the road alignment to avoid the steep slope azeas) or <br />an exception to the stipulation would be necessary. If an exception is granted, the stipulations for <br />moderate slopes would be applied. Construction of the new road would need to comply with specific <br />design and mitigation measures described in section 2.4 of this EA. <br />Slope mapping indicates that a total of 16 drill pads and 23 MDWs would be located in or adjacent to <br />' steep slopes (greater than 60 percent) where surface occupancy and use would be precluded under the <br />NSO for slopes >60 percent lease stipulation. In addition, a total of 36 drill pads and 50 MD Ws <br />would be located in or adjacent to moderate slope areas (40 to 60 percent) where specific design and <br />mitigation measures would be applicable under the CSU for slopes 40-60 percent lease stipulations. <br />Table T3, Drill Pad Stipulation Effects Summary, and Table T4, Road Stipulation Effects Summary, <br />display the affected drill pads and roads. <br />Segments of proposed access roads in Sylvester Gulch, East Fork Sylvester Gulch, and Box Canyon <br />may be located at the foot of steep slopes in the nazrow drainages. These locations are displayed on <br />Map 1, Project Area Activities With Surface Stipulations. There is a risk in these azeas of soil <br />slumping due to construction activities. Construction could result in surface instability and erosion, <br />as well as problems in constructing, maintaining, and reclaiming roads and drill pads. Where project- <br />related construction would occur in geologic hazazd or steep slope areas, exceptions to the applicable <br />stipulations would be necessary. USFS field construction review would focus on modification of the <br />proposed road to shift its location or change its configuration to avoid restricted azeas or minimize <br />impacts. In addition, specific design and mitigation measures would be effective in mitigating <br />potential environmental effects. <br />The Conditions of Approval listed in Section 2.4 of [his document include many measures designed <br />to minimize soil disturbance. Despite these practices, erosion, soil loss, and sediment transport from <br />newly disturbed azeas would still affect nearby drainages. Depending on proximity to streams and the <br />amount of sediment cazried by mnoff, surface water quality (turbidity and suspended solids) could be <br />temporarily impacted. <br />IP.iPP/A/r4i ldG/F~1/D~ 1/a/~).l.I l~2Ff <br />3/S/OIA <br />r.'nNNRn/Lnta[ft1fLSS)nenl <br />