Laserfiche WebLink
Coal Methane Drainage Prged - Pane6 76-24 Wert E!k Mine <br />with total dissolved solids concentrations between 43 and 2,300 mg/1. Sulfate, total dissolved solids <br />(I'DS), and manganese occasionally exceed the drinking water standard. <br />Bedrock contains ground water to a limited degree. The primary bedrock aquifers iri the area are the <br />lower Cretaceous Burro Canyon and Dakota Sandstone Formations. Stratigraphically, these <br />formations lie beneath several thousand feet of Mancos shale (below the Mesa Verde) and are <br />hydrologically isolated from the Mesa Verde Formation. <br />Ground water can also occur as isolated perched ground water occurrences. Perched ground water <br />occurrences are associated with Gthologic units that are hydrologically connected to a recharge source, <br />have sufficient permeability to store and transmit water, and aze underlain by a low permeabihty unit. <br />The low permeability unit(s) limits downward water migration, and a small saturated zone builds up in <br />the porous and permeable rock. Perched ground water occurrences aze typically relatively small, <br />discontinuous, and have very limited storage volume. <br />Underground water may also occur in the coal seams and associated stxaia, In the project area, the <br />coal seams and assouated strata dip to the northeast. The upper units outcrop in the North Fotk <br />Valley and are drained over a large area such that ground water occurrences in these units are rare. <br />The D Seam is known to contain water on the north side of the North Foxk Valley. The D Seam and <br />the overlying coalinterburden and overburden units are generally well-drained on the south side of <br />the river in the vicinity of the project area. <br />Ground water quality in the project area is highly variable dependent on recharge source, flow path, <br />strata with which the water comes in contact, and discharge mechanism. Water quality for <br />alluvial/colluvial ground water and perched ground water is commonly similar to surface water due to <br />close surface and ground water interactions and limited residence times. Deeper perched ground <br />water and any ground water associated with the coal seams that have been in contact with shales and <br />mudstones may exhibit elevated levels of total dissolved solids. <br />3.1.1;5 Riparian <br />Ripazian ecosystems typically occur along drainages where additional moisture {surface or ground <br />water) is available. They are transitional areas between terrestrial upland habitat and aquatic habitat. <br />Ripazian areas are not necessarily associated with wetlands, which generally have prolonged saturation <br />of the soil. For purposes of this EA, however, the term "ripazian" will be used to include aquatic <br />ecosystems (wetlands) as well as riparian ecosystems. In the project area, ripazian zones are usually <br />narrow in width due to the steep topography and narrow drainage bottoms. <br />There is no "typical" vegetation (for a riparian azea), vegetation varies with elevation and exposure. <br />A spruce-fir community is common to riparian azeas at higher elevations and aspen may be co- <br />dominant. Boxelder and narrow-leaf cottonwood may dominate riparian areas at lower elevations. <br />Wildlife rely on ripazian and wetland areas for many aspects of their survival both day to day and over <br />the long-term. These areas aze typically cooler than the surrounding hillslopes, aze important as <br />sources of Food and protection, and attract a diverse composition of species, more so than other <br />habitats. Additional discussion of riparian azeas relative to wildlife habitat and use is provided in <br />Section 3.2.1. <br />Riparian surveys conducted recently in the upper reaches of Sylvester Gulch provide informaton on <br />representative site-specific riparian conditions for the project area (Greystone, Nov. 2001a and b). <br />The identification and characterization of these "riparian" areas used protocol in a USFS guidance <br />document (USFS, 1995). Additional information on possible riparian azeas was provided in the <br />Threatened and Endangered Species (TES) survey for Panels 18 throagh 24 (Greystone, Oct. 2001b). <br />Possible riparian azeas were identified by the presence of aspen, bracken ferns, and other <br />EnvironmentolArrefrment <br />IP16F/Mwv. GHG/EI/0..,ti/a/4?Fr (/SFf <br />f/f/03J <br />