My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137683
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:38:18 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 6:22:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/2/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 13 Bonding Information
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
establishing lateral and longitudinal cross-sections depicting the disturbance area configuration for <br />the maximum disturbance scenario. Recontouring lines were then drawn on each cross-section to <br />meet the slope design criteria and to balance cut and fill volumes. These recontouring lines form <br />the framework for the topographic surface shown on the Bond Calculation Regraded Topography <br />Map -South, Map 36. Cut and fill volumes for recontouring were calculated by comparing the <br />maximum disturbance topography to the proposed recontoured topography using Softdesk, and <br />AutoCAD computer software programs. An eazthmoving swell factor of 17 percent was used to <br />convert from bank cubic yards (BCY) to loose cubic yazds (LCY) for bond reclamation grading <br />activities. It should be noted that this is different from the averaged life-of-mine swell factor of <br />20 percent used to develop the life-of mine material balance and postminng topography. <br />Documentation for calculated recontouring volumes is presented in Appendix A, Volume <br />Documentation. <br />Given relatively long, deep pit configurations, cast blasting of final benches and highwalls <br />was assumed as the initial step in recontouring pit areas. It was assumed that drilling for cast <br />blasting would be accomplished with overburden drills and that a contracted down-hole service <br />would be utilized for explosive loading and blasting operations. Areas and total overburden <br />volumes which could be blasted were determined using Softdesk, and AutoCAD computer <br />software programs, engineering judgment, and assuming a minimum overburden thickness of 40 <br />feet for blasting areas. Once the areas and volumes which could be blasted were determined, the <br />amount of material which would be cast into or across the pit by blasting was calculated using the <br />following formula (from -Productivity Improvements for Dragline Operations Using Controlled <br />Blasting in a Single and Multiple Seam Opencast Coal Operation of Rietspruit, South Africa, <br />refer to Appendix E, Other Documentation): <br />Percent Material Moved = 0.17 + 0.57 XDepth/Width <br />Assuming an average overburden or bench depth of 50 feet and average area or bench <br />width of 100 feet, approximately 46 percent of the material which could be drilled and blasted <br />would be moved to its final placement location by cast blasting. Computer printouts containing <br />calculations of total recontouring volumes, volumes of blasted material, and cast volumes are <br />presented in Appendix A, Volume Documentation. <br />Once cast blasting operations have been completed, material movement distances for <br />recontouring will be limited, therefore, it was determined that a tracked dozer could be effectively <br />utilized to complete most required final recontouring. Accordingly, average dozer push distances, <br />scraper haul distances, and operating grades were determined for each of the four disturbance <br />areas using material movement centroids. <br />5 Revision Dale: 5/8/03 <br />Revision No. TR-56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.