Laserfiche WebLink
Mark A. Heffner, Ecologist • <br />37 East Colorado Avenue <br />Denver, CO 80210-3105 <br />1'303) 722-9067 {Voice and Fax) <br />eca[ion ecology <br />and reclama[lon planning <br />Visual impact analysis <br />Documentary photography <br />May 25, 1999 RECEIVED <br />James E. Lockhart MAY 2 6 1999 <br />1718 Lorraine St. Apt. B4 <br />Colorado Springs, C080906 Division of Minetab&Ge010gy <br />RE: Your comments and objections to the Table Mountain Quarry application. <br />Dear Mr. Lockhart: <br />On behalf of my client, Castle Concrete Company, I wish to provide you with a response to your <br />letter of March 22, 1999, to the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. As it appears that this <br />matter will be going to heazing in June, I wish to provide you with some information that may be <br />helpful to your understanding of some of the matters of concern to you and your local Sierra Club <br />group. I will discuss each of the primary issues you present in your letter. <br />Public Recreational Use: This is the issue that seems to be of most concern. I have enclosed a cop}' of <br />a letter sent to Marshall Butler of the Fremont County Department of Planning and Zoning from <br />Mark Davis of the Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners. In this letter it is clearly pointed out <br />chat any party entering Table Mountain land managed by that agency without a purpose specifically <br />delineated in one of the many leases constitutes a trespass. Although in the past the area has been open <br />to hunting under the Division of Wildlife lease, using the land for purposes other than hunting is <br />inappropriate. There has been little control over unauthorized uses in the past, but that does not <br />change the situation that unauthorized uses still constitute a trespass, in the opinion of the land <br />management agency. <br />It is a common misconception that state land is public land similar to, for example, U.S. Forest <br />Service land. State land, although public land in the sense that it is owned by the state, is not public <br />land Eree for all to use, within reason. It is basically in the same classification as private property and is <br />managed as such. The state ]and was given to the western states by the Federal Government primaril}' <br />for the purpose of generating income for the state and most specifically for schools. Thus, it is ohen <br />called "school land." <br />The issue regazding public use of this land cannot be addressed by the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board as they are not the managing agency. Whether or not there is a quarry on the top <br />of Table Mountain will not alter the faa chat, in the opinion of the managing agency, entry for <br />purposes other than those provided for in the leases is a trespass. <br />You should be aware chat the Division of Wildlife has canceled their portion of the lease that <br />borders Highway l ls. In the future access will be provided for hunting from the Beaver CreeWBanta <br />Gulch area co the north of Table Mountain. This will allow the Division greater control over the use <br />of land under their lease and eliminates much of the problem with unauthorized uses from the <br />Highway 115 corridor. <br />