My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137230
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137230
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:53 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/15/2002
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-59 through 2.05-116
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.05.6(6) <br />(f)(ii) A narrative of the detailed description of the mining method and other <br />measures to be taken which may affect subsidence follows: <br />(f)(ii)(A) <br />Room and pillar and longwall mining will be used for coal removal. The size <br />sequence and timing for development is presented on Map 14, Mine Plan. <br />(f)(ii)(B) <br />Nearly all of the areas to be mined are areas in which planned-subsidence <br />mining methods will be used. There are a few exceptions to this statement <br />as outlined below. <br />In orderto protect againstchimney subsidence, only development mining will <br />be performed in areas with less than 110 feet of overburden. <br />The subsidence implications dealing with mining in low overburden areas <br />adjacent to the fault trace are a concern. The First North Mains mined into <br />• the fault in late 1997 or early 1998. Additionally, the Operator has probe <br />drilled the fault on numerous occasions. The fault is characterized as a <br />shear fault as opposed to a roll fault and little fracturing was noted. The <br />probe drilling has not encountered any appreciable waterwhich indicates the <br />fault trace is virtually dry. <br />The subsidence implications of mining through the fault are summarized in <br />Exhibit 15. Inadequate roof support could result in a conical chimney <br />collapse which could breach 285 feet of overburden. Additionally, regardless <br />of the depth, when a fault is encountered and coal is mined beneath the fault <br />plane on the upthrow side of the fault, a step on the surtace could result. As <br />explained in section 2.05.3(1), the Operator is committed to adequately <br />support the openings developed through the fault trace to avoid the <br />subsidence implications explained above. <br />Also when, during development of the panels near the outcrop, low quality <br />coal is encountered, one row of development pillars will be left in place to <br />prevent the potential crushing, sliding, or other failure near the outcrop. See <br />• Exhibit 15, Section 1.7. Zones Along Outcrop Barrier Pillar. <br />PR-04 2.05 - 106 - 01/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.