My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137121
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:45 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:34:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Cultural Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX D
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br />deposits, consisting of destruction of context and content, will be extremely <br />~dverse. Although this possibility must be recognized, it is not considered <br />likely due to the absence of prehistoric items in disturbed and~or eroded areas <br />as mentioned above. <br />Historic Remains <br />The bottle fragment (IF ,~2) mentioned on page ten of this report indicates <br />a pre-{~1kfI date of manufacture by its foreshortened mold seams which curve at the <br />begin*iing of the neck terminus (Hunt 1954: 9). These are the attributes of a <br />molded bottle to which the neck and terminus have been applied by hand. Its <br />color, showing a rainbow effect similar to oil oa water, is indicative of a c. <br />1920 date of manufacture and prolonged contact with moist earth (Kendrick 1967: 24). <br />Given the co-occurrence of the bottle fragment with itrJns of much later <br />manufacture and its attributes suggesting prolonged contact with moist earth, it <br />is hypothesized that the bottle was originally Sound in a different area and was <br />retained for an unspecified length of time prior to disposal with modem domestic <br />trash. <br />Destruction of the bottle fragment will result from use of the mining waste <br />.disposal area, but no further action is recommended. The infomation available <br />from the isolated Sind has been recorded in this report, and the item is of little <br />llirther value. <br />The possibility cf subsurface trash components of an historic nature must <br />also be recognized for this area, but is deemed unlikely. A limited probe of one <br />of the recent trash piles revealed no further deposits. The lack of ar~Y indications <br />of structural remains also indicates that the prrobability of large, buried historic <br />middens in the area is low. <br />The chiseled survey marker is of unknown age and origin. It is possible that <br />the slab was placed during one of the surveys of the area (1880's). Since the <br />artifact is outside the Nestern Slope Carbon project boundaries, no impact is ex- <br />petted. <br />There exists little in the form of printed information Sor the Oliver Mine, <br />tipple, power plant or townsite. However, with the help of Mrs. Shirley Lund of the <br />Paonia Public Library, the investigator was able to locate Margaret (Mrs. Fdwin) <br />Oliver, whose husband, brother~in-law, aria father~in-law owned and operated the mine <br />for maiLy years, and after whom the area was named. Mrs. Oliver, though she retains <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.