Laserfiche WebLink
MMRR Quarry, M-2004-067 <br />Response to Sept. 20, 2005 Adequacy Review <br />October 24, 2005 <br />Page 7 <br />The County's assertion that the Applicant is responsible fora "continuing failure <br />(or refusal) to comply with Gilpin County Zoning Regulations governing the off- <br />site impacts of the proposed quarry operation" is an unprecedented attempt to <br />frame a zoning violation with no evidence to substantiate such a claim. <br />Regardless of the effect of state Mineral Rules and Regulations, Gilpin County <br />Zoning Reguiations do not contain any provision regarding the timing of a County <br />Special Use application relative to a state Regular 112 Reclamation Permit <br />application. Like any other proposal to develop land, the Applicant for the <br />proposed MMRR Quarry is tackling the permitting process prior to actually <br />engaging in the land use. It would be illogical and counterproductive for an <br />applicant to be deemed in violation of zoning for a land use that has no physical <br />existence and is nothing more than a proposal. There is simply no basis in the <br />Gilpin County Zoning Resolution to find a zoning violation or proceed with an <br />enforcement action against the proposed MMRR Quarry. <br />In its September 12 letter, Gilpin County cites Section 1.713 of its code and <br />attaches its Special Use requirements for mining operations. The Applicant has <br />acknowledged the potential applicability of these County regulations on several <br />prior occasions. There is no active controversy regarding County regulations, <br />and, in any case, the Regular 112 permitting process does not provide an <br />appropriate forum for the resolution of questions that may exist about the <br />meaning of County regulations or their application to the MMRR Quarry. <br />The Applicant is committed to obtaining approval of all appropriate permits prior <br />to engaging in quarry-related land uses and will do so in a sequence that is <br />permitted by both state and local law. <br />Gilpin County (Petrock 8 Fendel, PC) - Highway 119 Access Permit. <br />The Applicant has been processing a State Highway Access Permit in parallel <br />with the M-2004-067 Regular 112 application. The State Highway Access Permit <br />for a driveway to the proposed quarry was issued on August 23, 2005 and <br />reflects the point of access as revised on Exhibits C and F submitted to the DMG <br />on August 19, 2005. A copy of the Access Permit was transmitted to the DMG <br />by email on September 8 and is attached hereto for your reference. <br />Gilpin County is incorrect in its statement that the Applicant has failed to submit <br />application materials describing the access point presently under consideration. <br />The first part of the August 19, 2005 applicant submittal specifically and explicitly <br />addressed a technical revision that adjusted plans to reflect the driveway location <br />on State Highway 119 under present consideration, now permitted as a state <br />highway access. <br />