My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136916
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:32 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:17:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/1/1998
Doc Name
pg 34 to 77
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.04.7(3) <br />event of measurable diminution in this drainage system the most <br />likely source of replacement or augmentation is the Granby Ditch <br />and Reservoir Company. Each share of Granby stock consists of <br />0.02 cfs decree water and 0.4 to 1.0 feet of reservoir water <br />available upon request. Granby water is imported, and the decree <br />is transferable to any ditch in the Williams Creek - Ward Creek <br />drainage and the reservoir water is transferable to nearly any <br />ditch in the Cedaredge area through trade arrangements with other <br />drainage systems. The monetary value of these shares varies from <br />year to year, but the share ares usually available. <br />As a matter of public record, the following water rights are <br />owned by the Operator: <br />Granby Ditch and Reservoir Company - 2 Shares <br />Drawing 2.04.5-1 and Table 2.04.5-1 show the water rights in the <br />Williams Creek - ward Creek drainages. Aproximately 400 to 500 <br />• Granby shares are diverted into this drainage and distributed <br />though various ditches. <br />The water rights replacement mechanisms would fall under three <br />categories: ground water replacement, surface water reestablish- <br />ment, and surface water replacement. <br />If the Operator's monitoring system proves damage to s well or <br />wells, the Operator would first attempt to re-establish the well. <br />Where re-establishment fails, the Operator proposes to replace or <br />supplement the damaged water well(s) with Coalby Domestic Water. <br />To satisfy damage to a well where a water tap now exists, the <br />Operator would pay the bill increment associated with supplying <br />equivalent quantities of water, with the limit being the well <br />permit quantity. For people without a water tap, the Operator <br />would purchase and maintain ownership of the water tap, and pay <br />for <br /> <br />64a <br />Rev. May 17, 1991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.