My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136825
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:27 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:10:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/22/1989
Doc Name
MINUTES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-zz- <br />• rules, you are not permitted to consider a mining application until you have <br />considered the source of water for the mine, for the mining operation, and the <br />water rights that are available for that operation. I'71 point you exactly to <br />your rule which says that. <br />MR. BARRY: I'm familiar with the rules. <br />you--started on the track that you had a ques <br />guess I disagree with your characterization. <br />water rights and source of water, and I think <br />time to time over the years. I don't believe <br />criteria or requirement. <br />MR. CDHEN: Well-- <br />I think my comment to <br />ti on about jurisdiction. And I <br />I understand your argument about <br />this Board has heard that from <br />that is a jurisdictional <br />MR. BARRY: That's an issue of compliance with the rules and regulations, <br />not a jurisdictional precondition. That's -- A jurisdictional problem, I <br />want to hear it up front, that's not a jurisdictional requirement in my views, <br />Luke, don't know whether your -- <br />MR. DANIELSDN: I haven't had a chance to look at it. I thiink we ought <br />to proceed -- <br />MR. CDHEN: That's not my presentation on the issue (scrambled <br />discussion). <br />MR. BARRY: The reason I asked up front is that if you were going to tell <br />us in your closing argument, we had no jurisdiction to do, to hear this <br />application do or doing, I want to get that up front. <br />MR. CDHEN: I understand. <br />MR. BARRY: And I do not characterize the argument, I'm not expressing an <br />opinion on the merits of the question about water rights issue. I just don't <br />. think it's jurisdictional. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.