My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136566
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:13 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 4:53:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 2.05-1 to 2.05-82
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation & Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West E!k Mine <br />This pond has a capacity of ten acre-feet, an embankment height of 19.5 feet, and a surface azea of <br />• I.10 acres. The pond is located on the natural bench above the valley floor at an approximate <br />elevation of 6,290 feet. <br />Normal surface runoff has been kept from entering Freshwater Pond- I (F W-1) by providing a ditch <br />upstream of the pond to intercept and carry the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) <br />assumption "B" storm flow to MB-1. This ditch keeps all nuisance flows from entering and <br />combining with the raw water stored in the fresh water pond. A spillway section has been designed <br />to pass many overland flows that may overtop this ditch and enter the pond. <br />Spillway Designs <br />Spillways have been sized using the broad crested weir equation, Q = CLF' S A coefficient "C", <br />of 2.67 was assumed as this is the low end of the practical range. Spillways are constructed of <br />riprap or gabions. The design head for each spillway has been limited to 2.50 ft. Freshwater <br />Pond-1 has a service spillway to ensure that small inadvertent flows entering the ponds are <br />passed without relying on the emergency spillway. The individual plan sets in Exhibit 43, <br />Exhibit 47, and Exhibit 66 includes all pertinent hydrologic and spillway data. <br />Stability Program Description <br />The stability analysis for the dams was performed using a slope stability computer program <br />(SLOPE II) developed by Geo Slope Programming, Ltd., Regina, Saskatchewan. The Ordinary <br />• (Fellenius) Method and the Simplified Bishop Methods were used to compute stability factors of <br />safety for each embankment's maximum cross section. <br />Both methodologies use the method of slices and utilize the limit equilibrium theory to solve the <br />factor of safety. The principal difference between the two methods is the treatment of interstice <br />forces. The Ordinary Method assumes that interstice forces can be ignored,while the Simplified <br />Bishop Method assumes that the interstice forces act horizontally. Merrick and Company's results <br />indicated that the Ordinary Method yielded lower factors of safety in all cases. Consequently, for all <br />subsequent trials on the given dam, only the Ordinary Method was used. <br />The computer program determines the factor of safety for slip circles of varying radii about <br />specified points but does not automatically converge on the minimum factor of safety. In order to <br />minimize cost, a coazse grid was initially established. The grid was then successively refined to <br />converge on the minimum factor of safety. In most cases three to five interactions were required. <br />Stability analysis for SG-1 was performed using a slope stability computer program entitled <br />XSTABL5.105. The program utilizes Bishops and/or Janbus method for circulaz or non-circular <br />failure. <br />• <br />2.05-34 Revised tan l996 R,Y03: Revised Nov. 1996 PR07; Revised Jan. l99%TRi9: Revised Jun. /990 TR90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.