My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136086
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:36:47 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 4:12:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/19/2006
Doc Name
AVF Demonstrations for Hayden Gulch Loadout
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 14 Attachment 14-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
subirrigated. North of the rail loop, in Section 10, the floodplain terraces are <br />irrigated £or grass hay and alfalfa. The upland benches and hillslopea are <br />generally used £or dryland agriculture and rangeland for livestock grazing and <br />wildlife habitat. <br />Irrigation. The Keammerer and Golder study included a land use and irrigation map <br />(this map is included in the Seneca II-W Mine permit as Exhibit 16-3) that depicts <br />the extent of subirrigation, existing land use and the extent of flood irrigation <br />in alluvial areas along Dry Creek within the study area. The extent of <br />subirrigation was determined on the basis of the vegetation growing on the valley <br />fill and alluvial deposits. In general, the subirrigated areas were defined as <br />those that were currently supporting riparian vegetation or vegetation that was <br />striking different from the surrounding uplands. Areas of existing flood <br />irrigation were evaluated using aerial photographs, field checking and water <br />rights information. The water rights information is included in the Tipton and <br />Kalmbach study (see Attachment 14-2, Water Rights Investigation and Augmentation <br />Plan for Dry Creek and Sage Creek), which mas also done for the Seneca II-W Mine. <br />Irrigation potential was evaluated on the basis of the relative size of the valley <br />floor, topographic considerations, and the availability of water. <br />The lower reach of Dry Creek is much different £rom the headwaters. Once the <br />creek exits Dry Creek canyon, it passes through a broad valley of alluvial <br />materials. The valley supports irrigated agriculture, primarily alfalfa and grass <br />hay. This agriculture area is partly on Dry Creek alluvium, but the fields are <br />flood irrigated with water from J.C. Temple Reservoir #1. Temple Gulch, an un- <br />named ephemeral drainage and Dill Gulch tun together to form the western edge of <br />the agriculture area (sea Exhibit 4-2; the area being described in located in <br />Sections 27 and 26). Dry Creek has been channelized and crosses the center of the <br />agriculture area. The fields on either aide of Dry Creek are flood irrigated £rom <br />the Dry Creek Ditch. The Dry Creek Ditch bends eastward and passes under Routt <br />County Road 53 to irrigate two fields of alfalfa in Section 22 and north of Dry <br />Creek. Water from Dry Creek contributes only a small portion of the water <br />diverted into the Dry Creek Ditch - most of the water is supplied from reservoir <br />flood irrigation systems. <br />Downstream of the irrigated alfalfa fields the land use becomes dryland farming. <br />The dryland acreages start in the northeast corner of Section 22 and northwest <br />corner Section 23. The dryland fields are shown on Exhibit 4-1, Land Use Map - <br />TR-07 14-3.3 Revised 03/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.