My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE136024
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE136024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:36:43 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 4:06:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977247
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/14/1979
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~5 <br /> <br />U <br />158 Ludwick <br />The amount of nutrient absorbed by the plants is then compared with <br />that extracted 6y the chemical solutions. The soil extract that <br />compares (correlates) best with plant uptake of the nutrient is <br />selected. <br />The second step in development of a soil test is called "cali- <br />bration." This involves determining the appropriate rate of fertili- <br />zation for a given soil test level. This work must be done under <br />actual production conditions to reflect those same conditions <br />experienced by growing crops. This involves a series of experiments <br />in which fertilizer rates for the nutrient in question are applied <br />from zero [o more than adequate for maximum yield. By conducting <br />these experiments on a wide range of soils over a period of time it <br />is possible to relate the laboratory soil test values to actual field <br />yields and rates of fertilizer necessary [o achieve maximum yields <br />(or other desired guals). Since various crops have different growth <br />habits and nutrient requirements, the same procedure must be Followed <br />for each of [hose important in the testing area. <br />ACTUAL PRACTICE <br />i <br />~a <br />{{ <br />i~ <br />i <br />!'~ <br />11 <br />The most serious problem of the CSU Soil Testing Laboratory <br />in its daily operation is obtaining a reliable sample for analysis. <br />This requires both careful sampling of the soil and handling between <br />the Field and the laboratory. Fields can be very heterogeneous in plant <br />available nutrients and selecting reasonably unifor~ areas is diffi- <br />cult. Usually areas for a single composite sample l' are grouped based <br />on field history and soil characteristics (color, slope, texture, <br />drainage, and degree of erosion). Other sampling decisions besides <br />determining the area per composite sample include sampling procedure <br />(i. e., random vs. systematic samplings within the selected area), <br />sampling depth, time of year to sample, and handling between the <br />field and the laboratory. Careful attention to each of these is <br />necessary if the soil sample is to be truly representative of the <br />field area. <br />In order [hat personnel at [he testing laboratory can formulate <br />a proper fertilizer recommendation, they must have specific information <br />on the crop to be grown (whether it be irrigated corn or a grass mix- <br />ture to revegeta[e a mine spoil) and its growing conditions. impro- <br />per information in this regard can lead to a bad recommendation just <br />as can happen when poor technique is used to obtain the sample in the <br />first place. <br />1~A._composite soil sample is the soil mixture representing a <br />~r' single field area composed of a number of individual samples (subsamples). <br />~._: <br />i <br />;}f <br />;'I . ~. <br />,"~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.