Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />MR. MASSEY: For the record, my name is Dean Massey. I represent Battle <br />Mountain Resources. It's not our intent here today to engage in a long debate <br />with the Board over these issues. As the letter states, we intend to fully <br />cooperate no matter what form or procedure the Board finally decines to do, <br />undertake. We ask for a continuance. We understand that the application will <br />be considered at the meeting in February. We'll cooperate fully whether that <br />meeting's held in the context of the form of a formal public hearing or a <br />regular meeting of the Board. We have no objection to holding a hearing. <br />There have been some procedural anomalies and we feel compelled to make the <br />necessary record, in fact, the rules have been violated and to register our <br />objection, for the purpose of preserving our rights in the event tnat we need <br />to make that objection in subsequent proceeding. That's the intention behind <br />what we are doing. We think your rules are clear. We think, in tnis case <br />also, that the ob,iector's got special notice that specifically noted and what <br />the obligations were. In light of that, they still chose to take the risk of <br />sending on the 4th, as I mentioned. <br />We really just need to make a record that in fact we have an abjection to <br />the procedural anomaly. And I would like to leave it at that and answer any <br />questions that the Board might have. <br />MS. WINTER: Were all requests for a formal public hearing late, that is <br />there wasn't--. <br />MR. RENNER: Yeah, we only had the eight. <br />MS. WINTER: They all came late? <br />MR. RENNER: They all came in on the 6th. <br />MR. O'CONNER: They sent them Overnight Express but they didn't -- is <br />that what you said? <br />MR. RENNER: They sent them Overnight Express on the 4th. <br />