My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE135739
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE135739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:36:26 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 3:51:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Two Dimensial Model of Trout Creek Sandstone Simulating Effects of Pumpage on Stream Flows
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 16 ATTACHMENT 16-B
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF THE TROUT CREEK SANDSTONE SIMULATING THE <br />EffECTS OF PUMPAGE ON STREAM FLOWS, SENECA IIW AND YOAST MINE S1TES <br />Introduction <br />The U.S. Geological Survey's finite-difference, ground-water flow <br /> <br />model, MODFLOW (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1984), was used to simulate the <br />effects of long-term well pumpage from Peabody's Seneca IIW and Yoast mine <br />properties on local and regional surface flow. Two proposed water supply <br />wells, one at each mine site, will provide potable water for mine <br />operation needs. Each well was estimated to pump water from the Trout <br />Creek sandstone at a constant rate of 35 gpm for a period of approximately <br />15 years for the Seneca IIW well (from year 1990 to 2004) and 9 years for <br />the Yoast well (from year 1996 to 2004). The model's focus was to <br />simulate ground-water flow in this unit and its interaction with surface <br />flow. <br />Within a ten-mile radius of both mine sites, the Trout Creek <br />sandstone crops out in several major drainages: at the head of Hubberson <br />Gulch, three places along Sage Creek, one place in Grassy Creek, two <br />places in Fish Creek, four places along Trout Creek, one place in Middle <br />Creek, and in two places along the Yampa River (Figure 1). It was <br />necessary to determine the amount of stream loss that may occur in these <br />areas from long-term pumpage in order to evaluate potential impacts to <br />surrounding water-resource users and to accurately estimate stream <br />replacement water volumes. <br />The Trout Creek sandstone is the uppermost member of the In es <br />r 1 <br />formation and is a prevalent marker bed in the region <br />8333003.004 <br />1 <br />The fine-grained <br />C;nnTranc ins <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.