Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• iii iiiiiiiiiim iii • <br /> <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA x: 303 832-8106 <br />~ ~tiTE OF COLORADO <br />pF COO <br />~~~Ry_ <br />ye s„ <br />r., n~<8~• <br />~ rB ]6 ~ <br />Ray Romer. <br />Goverrgr <br />Fred R. Banta. <br />Division Director <br />Oc'oper 23, 1991 <br />Dlr. `xark A. He'fcer <br />Transit Concrete Mix <br />p.0. 3ox 1030 <br />Colorape Springs, CO 80901 <br />Re: File No. M-73-7, Response to Mr. Heifner's Apparent Inference to <br />Discrepancies in the September 19, 1991 Inspection Report <br />Dear Mr. Heffner: <br />Icu had responded a lengthy apparent discreoency sport r=_garding the <br />inspection conducted at the Daniel's Sand Pit rf2 on September 19, 1991. I <br />would like to inform you that the insaector reported what he observed on site <br />and documented with photographs. I would like to address your response item <br />by item so we can resolve this matter. <br />In your opening statement you stated in 1985 an amendment was submitted and <br />approved for this operation and the immediately contiguous Castle Concrete <br />operation. Both of those permit amendments were prepared, processed, and <br />approved together because the reclamation of one site is dependent upon what <br />occurs on the adjacent site. There are other operations in the state where <br />operators that have far less corporate linkage .ban transit Mix and <br />Castle Concrete have what might be called "cooperative reclamation plans". <br />So this is not unique. Many of the figures and comments in your inspection <br />report do not reflect the changes made by the 1985 amendments. Those <br />amendments were intended to replace the previously approved plans, as will be <br />discussed later. <br />Therefore, the 1980 plan which may still be in a red, vinyl binder, is no <br />longer effective. The ne~.~f plans included in the 1985 amendment, which should <br />be in a lime green binder, are the ones that should be used in determining <br />what is supposed to happen on the site. In the unlikely event the 1985 permit <br />amendment is not included in your files we would be happy to provide you with <br />a copy. <br />The Division appreciates the gesture but we do have both copies. <br />