My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE135084
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE135084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:49 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 3:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/17/2001
Doc Name
BERM & LANDSCAPE PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT B
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ;~ <br />~' , ~,~,~lanning , <br />,~ services, inc. <br />July 12, 2001 <br />John Taufer <br />Taufer and Associates <br />P.o. Box zz71 <br />Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 <br />Re: Berming/L,andscape Plan for Mamm Creek <br />Dear John: <br />~~~,~ <br />a~ <br />.,~J ~ ~ C,_w' <br />With respect to the above referenced plan, I have completed the revisions recommended in your <br />letter of July 5, 2001 and as discussed ai our meeting of July 12, 2001 at Lee Leavenworth's <br />office. As you may know, we have an extremely tight schedule with the Division of Minerals <br />and Geology review process which cannot move ahead until the Berming and Landscaping Plan <br />is approved by the City. Therefore, we request that you expedite the review of this plan in order <br />to help us remA~n on a reasonable schedule with the State of Colorado. <br />Our responses to your letter of July 5 and our July 12 discussions are as follows below: <br />Landscape Plan -Berm `A' <br />1. The primary goal of the harming and landscape treatment along the southern boundary of the <br />mining site is to mitigate the visual impacts of the mining activities from I-70. Although the <br />landscape component of the plan illustrates approximately 22 trees and 80 shrubs on the <br />berm, the proposal falls short in adequately mitigating the mining site from I-70. I have <br />included a rough elevation of the proposed plan to illustrate my point <br />In order to achieve the aforementioned goal, we recommend that you specify an additional 30 <br />trees on the 10,000 s.f. Berm A template (35% of the additional tree material shall be <br />evergreen). As a tradeoff you can eliminate30 shrubs. I would suggest that you reduce <br />most of the sagebrush and rabbitbrush, and include common lilac to your plant palette. <br />Re ponce: This item was discussed at the July 12 meeting referenced above. It was agreed that <br />we would add IS more trees to Berm A, rather than the 30 as origfnalty requested Thirty shrubs <br />have been eliminated from thfs berm as well as recommended in your letter. Oiv plant palette <br />for Berm A now includes common lilac in the place of sagebrush and rabbitbrush. <br />2. The proposed bcrming and landscape plan generally depicts the plant types and quantities of <br />each type associated with the planting scheme but does not identify each individual species <br />on the planting plan. <br />Each individual plant shall be specifically identified on the plan view planting plan. <br />Resoonse.• Every individual plant in our berm detail has now been labeled,as requested <br />3. An elevation of the berm and associated planting scheme would be very beneficial in <br />determining the effect of the mitigation screen. <br />I would recommend you provide an elevation in addition to the plan view drawing. <br />Response: Completed See Sheer 3. <br />1 <br />box 947 -eagle, co 81631 - 970.328.6299 -fax 970.328.6254 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.