Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6/17N9 Mesa County Plan ' ommission Hearing <br />Mark Marshack (640 Bean Ranch Road, Whitewater) voiced similar coot and ndered why a less <br />desirable area couldn't be used for fill. <br />Denise Hamilton (351 Eagle Trail Court, Grand !unction) oppo roject, the site represen <br />the one naturally green area in Whitewater. She also expr concern o acts and vi 1 <br />im act m ' is t g a H' S0 <br />,r~r, <br />,., , <br />Lyle Sidner (no address given}, representing the Colorado D n of life, apologi 'tong <br />written comments. He agreed that the area was rich in ssurances wool that the <br />riparian habitat would not be damaged by the excavation. hat disturbance oft rea would be <br />short-term and he expected only short-term impacts as a resu <br />Chairman Benton asked or the current head wont of deer m area. was unsure but said that the <br />population seemed to be declining. When asked about h ling per ~ ner said that hunting was <br />extremely limited. <br />PETITIONER'S REBUTTAL <br />Mr. Logue said that upon completion, the ex sl no gr r than 3 feet horizontally and <br />1 foot vertically. The site's topsoil would turned ith reseeding to contain natural <br />desert-type grasses. Water would be retain t the bo o epth of 2-3 feet. The landowners <br />who typically used the site for grazing liv k asked t a pos se be developed to benefit livestock <br />grazing. Other sites were noted and r anon o ose sites een very successful. Excavation would <br />be outside of the tree line and approx' 75-1 t from K ah Creek at its closest point. One full-lime <br />water wagon would be retained onsi exc on. On ends in periods of high winds, homeowners <br />need only call pit operators to ha ditional ring pe ed. <br />Other sit d been roves ' ut the q ~ resistance value) on the subject site made it more <br />attractiv .The po old fluct noted that it would be charged with return irrigation <br />water th. a would t lace on site; rather, a portable source (fuel truck) would <br />be used. <br />UESTIO <br />Commissioner ed whe g would take place. Mr. Logue said that it would occur before <br />the fast fre ~ ~ !i tober) rly nett spring. He further explained that if seeding didn't "take" <br />this fall, evelop rn an reseed again in the spring. A $52K bond had been posted to ensure <br />succes reclamation Weed wntrol would be provided by WD Yards. <br />roan Benton asked f lion that water depth in the pond would be generally 2-3 feel. Mr. Logue <br />d affirmatively, bu dt'.41 that it could be higher or lower, depending on seasonal adjustments. When <br />if a depth of 2 feet Id be maintained, Mr. Logue responded affirmatively, except in years of extreme <br />ht. When aske r. Logue said that pond acreage would encompass approximately 16 acres. An <br />tar shoreline w present a more natural appearance. <br />ed how long the project might continue given the worst-case scenario. Mr. Logue said <br />old be completed no later than September 15, 1999, but added that the September 1 deadline <br />nd achievable. <br />