My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134739
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:26 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:39:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/10/2003
Doc Name
Limited Results Cultural Resource Survey II W Coal Refuse Facility (May 2003)
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.04-E2 Part 14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited-Results Cultural Resowce Survey Form (page 3 of 4) <br />LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) <br />25. Known Cultural Resources <br />In the project area: No previously rewrded sites have been identified in the project azea. <br />In the general region: One historic town and two prehistoric isolated fords have been recorded in the <br />general vicinity of the project area. <br />26. Expected Results: Few, ifany, cultural resources were expected because ofthe results ofprevious, nearby <br />and/or overlapping inventories, because of the relatively dense vegetation cover in some of theproject area <br />and because of the steep natwe of the terrain. <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. identify and assess any cultural resowces within potential area of effect <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site: five or more artifacts or a featwe, strvctwe or trail, or any combination of these <br />elements meeting OAHP criteria in a discrete location that is believed to represent the <br />locus ofpatterned human activity. <br />IF: fow or fewer artifacts without evidence of or potential for additional cultural. <br />materials or features in the immediate vicinity. <br />29. Describe Survey Method: Project area was inventoried using transects spaced nomore that20-30 m apart. <br />20 meter transects were walked along the proposed access comdors and areas with less than about a 20' <br />Slone. 30 meter transects were used in steeper areas. <br />VIII. RESULTS No cultural resowces <br /> <br />30. List IFS, if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. <br />A. Smithsonian Number: Description: <br />B. Smithsonian Number: Description: <br />C. Smithsonian Number: Description: <br />D. Smithsonian Number: Description: <br />31. Usingyourprofessionalknowledgeoftheregion,whyaretherenoneorverylimitedcuitura]remains <br />in the project area? Is there subsurface potential?: The topography and vegetation cover are such that <br />they are not conducive to occupation in any of the project area. Part of the eastern end of the project area <br />has experienced total disturbance from placement of an earlier disposal pile. Finally, soils in-the project <br />area are generally thin and/or very rocky as well, indicating little potential for subsurface cultwal deposits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.